Research ethics beyond the IRB: Selection bias and the direction of innovation in applied economics
AffiliationDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Arizona
MetadataShow full item record
CitationMichler, J. D., Masters, W. A., & Josephson, A. (2020). Research ethics beyond the IRB: Selection bias and the direction of innovation in applied economics. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy.
Rights© 2021 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AbstractPrinciples for ethical behavior in the context of research are codified into rules that may change over time to meet peoples’ needs in specific institutions, including universities and professional associations. This paper aims to spark discussion about a set of ethical choices beyond those addressed by an IRB or recent association policy statements. Our specific focus is topic selection and the role of researchers’ interests and incentives in determining the kinds of research that we do. Using the principle of induced innovation, we show how changing incentives can influence the direction of research effort and thereby affect the kinds of policies or technologies that are supported by available evidence. With this paper, we hope to generate discussion among applied economists about selection bias in research and how we can use insights from economics itself to guide topic selection.
Note12 month embargo; published online: 07 January 2021
VersionFinal accepted manuscript