An Interaction Ritual Theory of Social Resource Exchange: Evidence from a Silicon Valley Accelerator
Name:
Krishnan_Cook_Kozhikode_Schilk ...
Size:
2.127Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
University of ArizonaIssue Date
2020-11-27Keywords
acceleratorsentrepreneurship
ethnography
generalized exchange
interaction rituals
social resource exchange
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
SAGE PublicationsCitation
Krishnan, R., Cook, K. S., Kozhikode, R. K., & Schilke, O. (2020). An Interaction Ritual Theory of Social Resource Exchange: Evidence from a Silicon Valley Accelerator. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839220970936Journal
Administrative Science QuarterlyRights
© The Author(s) 2020.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Recent research on start-up accelerators has drawn attention to the central importance of social resource exchange among peers for entrepreneurial success. But such peer relationships contain both cooperative and competitive elements, making accelerators a prime example of a mixed-motive context in which successful generalized exchange—unilateral giving without expectations of direct reciprocity—is not a given. In our ethnographic study of a Silicon Valley accelerator, we sought to explore how generalized exchange emerges and evolves over time. Employing an abductive, sequential mixed-methods approach, we develop a process model that helps explain how a system of generalized exchange may or may not emerge. At the core of this model are the interaction rituals within social events that come to create distinct exchange expectations, which are either aligned or incompatible with generalized exchange, resulting in fulfilled or failed exchanges in subsequent encounters. Whereas fulfilled exchanges can kickstart virtuous exchange dynamics and a thriving generalized exchange system, failed exchanges trigger vicious exchange dynamics and an unstable social order. These findings bring clarity to the puzzle of how some generalized exchange systems overcome the social dilemma in mixed-motive contexts by highlighting the central role of alignment between structure and process. © The Author(s) 2020.ISSN
0001-8392EISSN
1930-3815Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1177/0001839220970936
