• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Honors Theses
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Honors Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    RECYCLED WASTE PLASTICS AS BUILDING MATERIAL FOR LOW-COST SHELTERS

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    azu_etd_hr_2020_0238_sip1_m.pdf
    Size:
    17.88Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Wong, Stanley
    Issue Date
    2020-05
    Advisor
    Brush, Adrianna
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    The University of Arizona.
    Rights
    Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
    Abstract
    Executive Summary: This project aims to divert plastic waste and recycle it into building materials. The end product is lightweight, cost effective, and durable while still being an effective thermal insulator. The process designed in this report can create building materials from waste plastics that can be utilized to build homes for low-income communities and victims of natural disasters. During the duration of this project, creating a prototype and finalizing an end product preceded the design of the process. The prototyping phase consisted of collecting three types of plastics, type 1 (PETE), type 2 (HDPE), and type 5 (PP). The plastics were then agitated with soap and water to get a clean material, air dried, and tested using two different heat sources, an iron and convection toaster oven. Four different experimental setups utilizing these two different heat sources were conducted. Inside these two sources, temperature and pressure were tracked and noted per experiment. Using the experimental results, a process was designed. Many conclusions were drawn from the results of this design. Based on the prototyping done by the team, it was determined that a mass ratio of 1:2:1 of PETE, HDPE, and PP plastics was ideal for forming a brick. It was also concluded that the ideal size for these bricks was 6” x 12” x 3.75”. This allows for a large enough volume to reduce the amount of bricks required to construct a strong structure but is not so large that it is extremely heavy. There are square protrusions of 3.85” x 3.85” x 1.07” on the top and indentations on the bottom of the brick of the same dimensions. These protrusions and indentations allow for bricks to interlock and easily snap together to form walls and corners. A semi-batch process proved to be the best way to operate a plant for this process, which sorts, cleans, and shreds the plastic before forming the end product. The process proved to be economically feasible with an annual profit of over $600,000. There is still some uncertainty in the end product design. This is due mostly to a halt in prototyping due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the process design is based off of what the team was able to accomplish prior to the pandemic. There are three major assumptions in the design of this process. First, it is assumed that there is a market for our product stemming from an ​increased​ frequency of natural disasters. The second assumption is that the plant is able to obtain the used plastics for the process for free which would likely come from a local recycling center. Finally, an assumption that there is enough plastic and market to warrant running the plant continuously as a semi-batch process. Another major uncertainty lies with how much of each compound is released in the vapor fumes and further testing for this parameter is highly recommended. However, this project can be economically feasible given the current run conditions and assumptions. It is recommended that this process move forward after further prototyping is done and more is understood about the compounds present in fumes.
    Type
    Electronic Thesis
    text
    Degree Name
    B.S.
    Degree Level
    bachelors
    Degree Program
    Chemical Engineering
    Honors College
    Degree Grantor
    University of Arizona
    Collections
    Honors Theses

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.