10Be Analyses with a Compact AMS Facility—Are BeF2 Samples the Solution?
dc.contributor.author | Wacker, L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Grajcar, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ivy-Ochs, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kubik, PW | |
dc.contributor.author | Suter, M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-11T21:45:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-11T21:45:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004-01-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Wacker, L., Grajcar, M., Ivy-Ochs, S., Kubik, P. W., & Suter, M. (2004). 10Be analyses with a compact AMS facility—are BeF2 samples the solution?. Radiocarbon, 46(1), 83-88. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0033-8222 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S0033822200039382 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/654689 | |
dc.description | From the 18th International Radiocarbon Conference held in Wellington, New Zealand, September 1-5, 2003. | |
dc.description.abstract | The injection of 10BeFinstead of10BeOinto a compact accelerator mass spectrometry system with a terminal voltage of 0.58 MV was investigated, because BFmolecules are unstable and isobaric interference of 10B with 10Be can thus be significantly reduced. We describe the method we developed to prepare BeF2samples. 10Be was measured in a segmented gas ionization detector. Separation of 10Be from 10B could be achieved both for ions in the 1+ charge state with an energy of 0.8 MeV and in the 2+ charge state with an energy of 1.4 MeV. The 2+ ions are better separated, whereas the 1+ charge state has a higher transmission. 10Be/9Be ratios (approximately 10^-12) in a suite of rock samples were successfully determined for exposure dating in either charge state and compared with measurements made on the 6MV tandem. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Department of Geosciences, The University of Arizona | |
dc.relation.url | http://radiocarbon.webhost.uits.arizona.edu/ | |
dc.rights | Copyright © by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona. All rights reserved. | |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
dc.subject | absolute age | |
dc.subject | accelerator mass spectroscopy | |
dc.subject | alkaline earth metals | |
dc.subject | Be 10 | |
dc.subject | Be 10 Be 9 | |
dc.subject | beryllium | |
dc.subject | electrical conductivity | |
dc.subject | heat flow | |
dc.subject | ions | |
dc.subject | isotope ratios | |
dc.subject | isotopes | |
dc.subject | mass spectroscopy | |
dc.subject | measurement | |
dc.subject | metals | |
dc.subject | methods | |
dc.subject | niobium | |
dc.subject | radioactive isotopes | |
dc.subject | sample preparation | |
dc.subject | spectroscopy | |
dc.subject | stable isotopes | |
dc.subject | thermal conductivity | |
dc.title | 10Be Analyses with a Compact AMS Facility—Are BeF2 Samples the Solution? | |
dc.type | Proceedings | |
dc.type | text | |
dc.identifier.journal | Radiocarbon | |
dc.description.collectioninformation | The Radiocarbon archives are made available by Radiocarbon and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | |
dc.description.admin-note | Migrated from OJS platform February 2021 | |
dc.source.volume | 46 | |
dc.source.issue | 1 | |
dc.source.beginpage | 83 | |
dc.source.endpage | 88 | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-02-11T21:45:08Z |