• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Faculty Research
    • UA Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Faculty Research
    • UA Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    A New Multilateralism? A Case Study of the Belt and Road Initiative

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Jingyuan_Zhou_A_New_Multilater ...
    Size:
    610.5Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Final Accepted Manuscript
    Download
    Author
    Zhou, Jingyuan
    Affiliation
    James E. Rogers College of Law, University of Arizona
    Issue Date
    2020-08-30
    Keywords
    Belt and Road Initiative
    Case Study
    Governance
    International Trade
    Multilateralism
    World Trade Organization
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Jingyuan Zhou, A New Multilateralism? A Case Study of the Belt and Road Initiative, The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, Volume 8, Issue 2, September 2020, Pages 384–413, https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxaa022
    Publisher
    Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Journal
    Chinese Journal of Comparative Law
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10150/655450
    DOI
    10.1093/cjcl/cxaa022
    Abstract
    The first five years (the first stage) of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) have drawn international attention and provoked scepticism and debate. This article explores questions about the nature of the BRI and its impact on multilateralism, which is increasingly fragile and under attack. After summarizing past practices employed in BRI investments, it analyses the characteristics of the BRI and assesses the results and implications. This article studies in depth one of the two primary BRI economic activities—special economic zones. The article introduces and compares the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and Chinese domestic banks in their respective financing practices and compares state-owned enterprises and privately owned enterprises in BRI practices. The article observes three characteristics from past BRI practices and analyzes their respective implications on the transformation of international trade governance. The first characteristic is the unconventional ‘infrastructure development first, institution next’ approach. The second is the plurilateral- and multilateral-focused method in international rule-setting processes. The third characteristic is innovation in the dispute settlement mechanism. Through a cautious examination, the article argues that experiences gained from BRI inform China’s international rule-making efforts and further its domestic trade liberalization reform agenda, which will likely contribute to the convergence of rule-making in international trade. © The Author(s) (2020). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    2050-4802
    EISSN
    2050-4810
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1093/cjcl/cxaa022
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Law Faculty Publications
    UA Faculty Publications

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.