We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 6th, 2024 - no new submissions will be accepted; however, all content already published will remain publicly available. Please reach out to repository@u.library.arizona.edu with your questions, or if you are a UA affiliate who needs to make content available soon. Note that any new user accounts created after September 22, 2024 will need to be recreated by the user in November after our migration is completed.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRubin, A. E.
dc.contributor.authorBottke, W. F.
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-12T22:53:39Z
dc.date.available2021-02-12T22:53:39Z
dc.date.issued2009-01-01
dc.identifier.citationRubin, A. E., & Bottke, W. F. (2009). On the origin of shocked and unshocked CM clasts in H‐chondrite regolith breccias. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 44(5), 701-724.
dc.identifier.issn1945-5100
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1945-5100.2009.tb00764.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/656571
dc.description.abstractCM chondrite clasts that have experienced different degrees of aqueous alteration occur in H-chondrite and HED meteorite breccias. Many clasts are fragments of essentially unshocked CM projectiles that accreted at low relative velocities to the regoliths of these parent bodies. A few clasts were heated and dehydrated upon impact; these objects most likely accreted at higher relative velocities. We examined three clasts and explored alternative scenarios for their formation. In the first scenario, we assumed that the H and HED parent bodies had diameters of a few hundred kilometers, so that their high escape velocities would effectively prevent soft landings of small CM projectiles. This would imply that weakly shocked CM clasts formed on asteroidal fragments (family members) associated with the H and HED parent bodies. In the second scenario, we assumed that weakly shocked CM clasts were spall products ejected at low velocities from larger CM projectiles when they slammed into the H and HED parent bodies. In both cases, if most CM clasts turn out to have ancient ages (e.g., ~3.4-4.1 Ga), a plausible source for their progenitors would be outer main belt objects, some which may have been dynamically implanted 3.9 Ga ago by the events described in the so-called Nice model. On the other hand, if most CM clasts have recent ages (<200 Ma), a plausible source location for their parent body would be the inner main belt between 2.1-2.2 AU. In that case, the possible source of the CM-clasts progenitors parent fragments would be the breakup ~160 Ma ago of the parent body 170 km in diameter of the Baptistina asteroid family (BAF).
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThe Meteoritical Society
dc.relation.urlhttps://meteoritical.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © The Meteoritical Society
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectregolith breccia
dc.subjectasteroid disruption
dc.subjectasteroid families
dc.subjectCM carbonaceous chondrite meteorites
dc.titleOn the origin of shocked and unshocked CM clasts in H-chondrite regolith breccias
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.identifier.journalMeteoritics & Planetary Science
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Meteoritics & Planetary Science archives are made available by the Meteoritical Society and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform February 2021
dc.source.volume44
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.beginpage701
dc.source.endpage724
refterms.dateFOA2021-02-12T22:53:39Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
15730-18083-1-PB.pdf
Size:
10.02Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record