Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWarren, S. D.
dc.contributor.authorSt. Clair, L. L.
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, J. R.
dc.contributor.authorKugrens, P.
dc.contributor.authorBaggett, L. S.
dc.contributor.authorBird, B. J.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-08T18:37:40Z
dc.date.available2021-03-08T18:37:40Z
dc.date.issued2015-05
dc.identifier.citationWarren, S. D., St.Clair, L. L., Johansen, J. R., Kugrens, P., Baggett, L. S., & Bird, B. J. (2015). Biological Soil Crust Response to Late Season Prescribed Fire in a Great Basin Juniper Woodland. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 68(3), 241–247.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409x
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rama.2015.03.007
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/656924
dc.description.abstractExpansion of juniper on U.S. rangelands is a significant environmental concern. Prescribed fire is often recommended to control juniper. To that end, a prescribed burn was conducted in a Great Basin juniper woodland. Conditions were suboptimal; fire did not encroach into mid- or late-seral stages and was patchy in the early-seral stage. This study evaluated the effects of the burn on biological soil crusts of early-seral juniper. Fire reduced moss cover under sagebrush and in shrub interspaces. Mosses were rare under juniper; their cover was unaffected there. Lichens were uncommon under juniper and sagebrush and therefore not significantly impacted there. Their cover was greater in shrub interspaces, but because the fire was spotty and of low intensity, the effects of burning were minimal. Compared with unburned plots, the biomass of cyanobacteria was diminished under juniper and sagebrush; it was reduced in the interspaces in both burned and unburned plots, presumably in response to generally harsher conditions in the postburn environment. Nitrogen fixation rates declined over time in juniper plots and interspaces but not in sagebrush plots. Although fire negatively affected some biological soil crust organisms in some parts of the early-seral juniper woodland, the overall impact on the crusts was minimal. If the intent of burning is to reduce juniper, burning of early-seral juniper woodland is appropriate, as most affected trees were killed. Control of sagebrush can likewise be accomplished by low-intensity, cool season fires without eliminating the crust component. Intense fire should be avoided due to the potential for greater encroachment into the shrub interspaces, which contain the majority of biological soil crust organisms. Burning early-seral juniper may be preferred for controlling juniper encroachment on rangeland. © 2015, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectcyanobacteria
dc.subjectgreen algae
dc.subjectlichens
dc.subjectmosses
dc.subjectnitrogen fixation
dc.subjectprescribed burn
dc.titleBiological Soil Crust Response to Late Season Prescribed Fire in a Great Basin Juniper Woodland
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.source.journaltitleRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.source.volume68
dc.source.issue3
dc.source.beginpage241
dc.source.endpage247
refterms.dateFOA2021-03-08T18:37:40Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Biological-Soil-Crust-Response ...
Size:
575.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record