Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNafus, A. M.
dc.contributor.authorSvejcar, T. J.
dc.contributor.authorGanskopp, D. C.
dc.contributor.authorDavies, K. W.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-08T18:38:17Z
dc.date.available2021-03-08T18:38:17Z
dc.date.issued2015-03
dc.identifier.citationNafus, A. M., Svejcar, T. J., Ganskopp, D. C., & Davies, K. W. (2015). Abundances of coplanted native bunchgrasses and crested wheatgrass after 13 years. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 68(2), 211–214.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409x
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rama.2015.01.011
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/656935
dc.description.abstractCrested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum [L] Gaertm) has been seeded on more than 5 million hectares in western North America because it establishes more readily than native bunchgrasses. Currently, there is substantial interest in reestablishing native species in sagebrush steppe, but efforts to reintroduce native grasses into crested wheatgrass stands have been largely unsuccessful, and little is known about the long-term dynamics of crested wheatgrass/native species mixes. We examined the abundance of crested wheatgrass and seven native sagebrush steppe bunchgrasses planted concurrently at equal low densities in nongrazed and unburned plots. Thirteen years post establishment, crested wheatgrass was the dominant bunchgrass, with a 10-fold increase in density. Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis Elmer), Thurber's needlegrass (Achnatherum thurberianum (Piper) Barkworth), basin wildrye (Leymus cinereus [Scribn. & Merr.] A. Löve), and Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda J. Presl) maintained their low planting density, whereas bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata [Pursh] A. Löve), needle-and-thread (Hesperostipa comata [Trin. & Rupr.] Barkworth), and squirreltail (Elymus elymoides [Raf.] Swezey) densities declined. Our results suggest that densities of native bunchgrasses planted with crested wheatgrass are unlikely to increase and that some species may only persist at low levels. The high recruitment of crested wheatgrass suggests that coplanting of some native bunchgrasses may be a viable way of avoiding crested wheatgrass monocultures when this species is necessary for rehabilitation or restoration. © 2015 Society for Range Management. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectAgropyron cristatum
dc.subjectrestoration
dc.subjectrevegetation
dc.subjectsagebrush steppe
dc.titleAbundances of coplanted native bunchgrasses and crested wheatgrass after 13 years
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.source.journaltitleRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.source.volume68
dc.source.issue2
dc.source.beginpage211
dc.source.endpage214
refterms.dateFOA2021-03-08T18:38:17Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Abundances-of-Coplanted-Native ...
Size:
310.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record