Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoyte, S. P.
dc.contributor.authorWylie, B. K.
dc.contributor.authorMajor, D. J.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-08T18:39:18Z
dc.date.available2021-03-08T18:39:18Z
dc.date.issued2015-01
dc.identifier.citationBoyte, S. P., Wylie, B. K., & Major, D. J. (2015). Mapping and monitoring cheatgrass dieoff in rangelands of the Northern Great Basin, USA. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 68(1), 18–28.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409x
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rama.2014.12.005
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/656952
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) dynamics in the Northern Great Basin rangelands, USA, is necessary to effectively manage the region's lands. This study's goal was to map and monitor cheatgrass performance to identify where and when cheatgrass dieoff occurred in the Northern Great Basin and to discover how this phenomenon was affected by climatic, topographic, and edaphic variables. We also examined how fire affected cheatgrass performance. Land managers and scientists are concerned by cheatgrass dieoff because it can increase land degradation, and its causes and effects are not fully known. To better understand the scope of cheatgrass dieoff, we developed multiple ecological models that integrated remote sensing data with geophysical and biophysical data. The models' R2 ranged from 0.71 to 0.88, and their root mean squared errors (RMSEs) ranged from 3.07 to 6.95. Validation of dieoff data showed that 41% of pixels within independently developed dieoff polygons were accurately classified as dieoff, whereas 2% of pixels outside of dieoff polygons were classified as dieoff. Site potential, a long-term spatial average of cheatgrass cover, dominated the development of the cheatgrass performance model. Fire negatively affected cheatgrass performance 1 year postfire, but by the second year postfire performance exceeded prefire levels. The landscape-scale monitoring study presented in this paper helps increase knowledge about recent rangeland dynamics, including where cheatgrass dieoffs occurred and how cheatgrass responded to fire. This knowledge can help direct further investigation and/or guide land management activities that can capitalize on, or mitigate the effects of, cheatgrass dieoff. © 2015 Society for Range Management. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectBromus tectorum
dc.subjectecological models
dc.subjectinvasive species
dc.subjectland cover change
dc.subjectMODIS
dc.subjectSnake River Plain
dc.titleMapping and monitoring cheatgrass dieoff in rangelands of the Northern Great Basin, USA
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.source.journaltitleRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.source.volume68
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage18
dc.source.endpage28
refterms.dateFOA2021-03-08T18:39:19Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Mapping-and-Monitoring-Cheatgr ...
Size:
2.771Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record