The dynamics of explore–exploit decisions reveal a signal-to-noise mechanism for random exploration
Name:
s41598-021-82530-8.pdf
Size:
2.127Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Department of Psychology, University of ArizonaCognitive Science Program, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2021-02-04
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Nature ResearchCitation
Feng, S. F., Wang, S., Zarnescu, S., & Wilson, R. C. (2021). The dynamics of explore–exploit decisions reveal a signal-to-noise mechanism for random exploration. Scientific reports, 11(1), 1-15.Journal
Scientific ReportsRights
© The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Growing evidence suggests that behavioral variability plays a critical role in how humans manage the tradeoff between exploration and exploitation. In these decisions a little variability can help us to overcome the desire to exploit known rewards by encouraging us to randomly explore something else. Here we investigate how such ‘random exploration’ could be controlled using a drift-diffusion model of the explore–exploit choice. In this model, variability is controlled by either the signal-to-noise ratio with which reward is encoded (the ‘drift rate’), or the amount of information required before a decision is made (the ‘threshold’). By fitting this model to behavior, we find that while, statistically, both drift and threshold change when people randomly explore, numerically, the change in drift rate has by far the largest effect. This suggests that random exploration is primarily driven by changes in the signal-to-noise ratio with which reward information is represented in the brain.Note
Open access journalISSN
2045-2322EISSN
2045-2322Version
Final published versionSponsors
National Institute on Agingae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1038/s41598-021-82530-8
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.