Multiple drivers behind mislabeling of fish from artisanal fisheries in La Paz, Mexico
Affiliation
Conservation Genetics Laboratory and Desert Laboratory on Tumamoc Hill, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2021-01-29Keywords
DNA barcoding; Seafood chain; Seafood mislabeling; Small-scale fisheries; Species substitution; TraceabilitySeafood chain
Seafood mislabeling
Small-scale fisheries
Species substitution
Traceability
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
PeerJ Inc.Citation
Munguia-Vega, A., Weaver, A. H., Domínguez-Contreras, J. F., & Peckham, H. (2021). Multiple drivers behind mislabeling of fish from artisanal fisheries in La Paz, Mexico. PeerJ, 9, e10750.Journal
PeerJRights
Copyright 2021 Munguia-Vega et al. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Seafood mislabeling has the potential to mask changes in the supply of species due to overfishing, while also preventing consumers from making informed choices about the origin, quality and sustainability of their food. Thus, there is a need to understand mislabeling and analyze the potential causes behind it to propose solutions. We conducted a COI DNA barcoding study in La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico, with 74 samples from fish markets and 50 samples from restaurants. We identified 38 species sold under 19 commercial names, from which at least ∼80% came from local small-scale fisheries. Overall, 49 samples, representing 40% (95% CI [31.4–48.3]) were considered mislabeled in our samples. Based on analyses where species were assigned to three price categories, economic incentives were associated with approximately half of the mislabeling events observed, suggesting that other motivating factors might simultaneously be at play. Using a network approach to describe both mislabeling (when species are mislabeled as the focal species) and substitution (when the focal species is used as substitute for others), we calculated proxies for the net availability of each species in the market. We found that local fish landings were a significant predictor of the net availability of the 10 most important commercial species at retail, but this true availability was masked to the eyes of the final consumer by both mislabeling and substitution. We hypothesize that the level of supply of each species could help explain mislabeling and substitution rates, where species in low supply and high demand could show higher mislabeling rates and rarely be used as substitutes, while species in high supply and low demand could be used as substitutes for the preferred species. Other factors affecting mislabeling include national regulations that restrict the fishing or commercialization of certain species and local and global campaigns that discourage specific patterns of consumption. We discuss how these factors might influence mislabeling and propose some solutions related to communication and education efforts to this local and global challenge. Copyright 2021 Munguia-Vega et al.Note
Open access journalISSN
2167-8359EISSN
2167-8359Version
Final published versionSponsors
Lab Applied Genomicsae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.7717/peerj.10750
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright 2021 Munguia-Vega et al. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0.