• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Faculty Research
    • UA Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Faculty Research
    • UA Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Optimizing the lens sample in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    PhysRevD.103.043503.pdf
    Size:
    1.407Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Final Published Version
    Download
    Author
    Porredon, A.
    Crocce, M.
    Fosalba, P.
    Elvin-Poole, J.
    Carnero Rosell, A.
    Cawthon, R.
    Eifler, T. F.
    Fang, X.
    Ferrero, I.
    Krause, E.
    MacCrann, N.
    Weaverdyck, N.
    Abbott, T. M. C.
    Aguena, M.
    Allam, S.
    Amon, A.
    Avila, S.
    Bacon, D.
    Bertin, E.
    Bhargava, S.
    Bridle, S. L.
    Brooks, D.
    Carrasco Kind, M.
    Carretero, J.
    Castander, F. J.
    Choi, A.
    Costanzi, M.
    da Costa, L. N.
    Pereira, M. E. S.
    De Vicente, J.
    Desai, S.
    Diehl, H. T.
    Doel, P.
    Drlica-Wagner, A.
    Eckert, K.
    Ferté, A.
    Flaugher, B.
    Frieman, J.
    García-Bellido, J.
    Gaztanaga, E.
    Gerdes, D. W.
    Giannantonio, T.
    Gruen, D.
    Gruendl, R. A.
    Gschwend, J.
    Gutierrez, G.
    Hartley, W. G.
    Hinton, S. R.
    Hollowood, D. L.
    Honscheid, K.
    Hoyle, B.
    James, D. J.
    Jarvis, M.
    Kuehn, K.
    Kuropatkin, N.
    Maia, M. A. G.
    Marshall, J. L.
    Menanteau, F.
    Miquel, R.
    Morgan, R.
    Palmese, A.
    Pandey, S.
    Paz-Chinchón, F.
    Plazas, A. A.
    Rodriguez-Monroy, M.
    Roodman, A.
    Samuroff, S.
    Sanchez, E.
    Scarpine, V.
    Serrano, S.
    Sevilla-Noarbe, I.
    Smith, M.
    Soares-Santos, M.
    Suchyta, E.
    Swanson, M. E. C.
    Tarle, G.
    To, C.
    Varga, T. N.
    Weller, J.
    Wilkinson, R. D.
    DES Collaboration
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    Department of Astronomy, University of Arizona
    Steward Observatory, University of Arizona
    Issue Date
    2021-02-01
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    American Physical Society
    Citation
    Porredon, A., Crocce, M., Fosalba, P., Elvin-Poole, J., Rosell, A. C., Cawthon, R., ... & DES Collaboration. (2021). Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Optimizing the lens sample in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis. Physical Review D, 103(4), 043503.
    Journal
    Physical Review D
    Rights
    © 2021 American Physical Society.
    Collection Information
    This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
    Abstract
    We investigate potential gains in cosmological constraints from the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing by optimizing the lens galaxy sample selection using information from Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data and assuming the DES Year 1 metacalibration sample for the sources. We explore easily reproducible selections based on magnitude cuts in i-band as a function of (photometric) redshift, zphot, and benchmark the potential gains against those using the well-established redMaGiC [E. Rozo et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 1431 (2016)MNRAA40035-871110.1093/mnras/stw1281] sample. We focus on the balance between density and photometric redshift accuracy, while marginalizing over a realistic set of cosmological and systematic parameters. Our optimal selection, the MagLim sample, satisfies i<4zphot+18 and has ∼30% wider redshift distributions but ∼3.5 times more galaxies than redMaGiC. Assuming a wCDM model (i.e. with a free parameter for the dark energy equation of state) and equivalent scale cuts to mitigate nonlinear effects, this leads to 40% increase in the figure of merit for the pair combinations of ωm, w, and σ8, and gains of 16% in σ8, 10% in ωm, and 12% in w. Similarly, in ΛCDM, we find an improvement of 19% and 27% on σ8 and ωm, respectively. We also explore flux-limited samples with a flat magnitude cut finding that the optimal selection, i<22.2, has ∼7 times more galaxies and ∼20% wider redshift distributions compared to MagLim, but slightly worse constraints. We show that our results are robust with respect to the assumed galaxy bias and photometric redshift uncertainties with only moderate further gains from increased number of tomographic bins or the inclusion of bin cross-correlations, except in the case of the flux-limited sample, for which these gains are more significant. © 2021 American Physical Society.
    ISSN
    2470-0010
    EISSN
    2470-0029
    DOI
    10.1103/physrevd.103.043503
    Version
    Final published version
    Sponsors
    University of Nottingham
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1103/physrevd.103.043503
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UA Faculty Publications

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.