We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 6th, 2024 - no new submissions will be accepted; however, all content already published will remain publicly available. Please reach out to repository@u.library.arizona.edu with your questions, or if you are a UA affiliate who needs to make content available soon. Note that any new user accounts created after September 22, 2024 will need to be recreated by the user in November after our migration is completed.
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Optimizing the lens sample in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis
Name:
PhysRevD.103.043503.pdf
Size:
1.407Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Porredon, A.Crocce, M.
Fosalba, P.
Elvin-Poole, J.
Carnero Rosell, A.
Cawthon, R.
Eifler, T. F.
Fang, X.
Ferrero, I.
Krause, E.
MacCrann, N.
Weaverdyck, N.
Abbott, T. M. C.
Aguena, M.
Allam, S.
Amon, A.
Avila, S.
Bacon, D.
Bertin, E.
Bhargava, S.
Bridle, S. L.
Brooks, D.
Carrasco Kind, M.
Carretero, J.
Castander, F. J.
Choi, A.
Costanzi, M.
da Costa, L. N.
Pereira, M. E. S.
De Vicente, J.
Desai, S.
Diehl, H. T.
Doel, P.
Drlica-Wagner, A.
Eckert, K.
Ferté, A.
Flaugher, B.
Frieman, J.
García-Bellido, J.
Gaztanaga, E.
Gerdes, D. W.
Giannantonio, T.
Gruen, D.
Gruendl, R. A.
Gschwend, J.
Gutierrez, G.
Hartley, W. G.
Hinton, S. R.
Hollowood, D. L.
Honscheid, K.
Hoyle, B.
James, D. J.
Jarvis, M.
Kuehn, K.
Kuropatkin, N.
Maia, M. A. G.
Marshall, J. L.
Menanteau, F.
Miquel, R.
Morgan, R.
Palmese, A.
Pandey, S.
Paz-Chinchón, F.
Plazas, A. A.
Rodriguez-Monroy, M.
Roodman, A.
Samuroff, S.
Sanchez, E.
Scarpine, V.
Serrano, S.
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.
Smith, M.
Soares-Santos, M.
Suchyta, E.
Swanson, M. E. C.
Tarle, G.
To, C.
Varga, T. N.
Weller, J.
Wilkinson, R. D.
DES Collaboration
Affiliation
Department of Astronomy, University of ArizonaSteward Observatory, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2021-02-01
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
American Physical SocietyCitation
Porredon, A., Crocce, M., Fosalba, P., Elvin-Poole, J., Rosell, A. C., Cawthon, R., ... & DES Collaboration. (2021). Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Optimizing the lens sample in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis. Physical Review D, 103(4), 043503.Journal
Physical Review DRights
© 2021 American Physical Society.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We investigate potential gains in cosmological constraints from the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing by optimizing the lens galaxy sample selection using information from Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data and assuming the DES Year 1 metacalibration sample for the sources. We explore easily reproducible selections based on magnitude cuts in i-band as a function of (photometric) redshift, zphot, and benchmark the potential gains against those using the well-established redMaGiC [E. Rozo et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 1431 (2016)MNRAA40035-871110.1093/mnras/stw1281] sample. We focus on the balance between density and photometric redshift accuracy, while marginalizing over a realistic set of cosmological and systematic parameters. Our optimal selection, the MagLim sample, satisfies i<4zphot+18 and has ∼30% wider redshift distributions but ∼3.5 times more galaxies than redMaGiC. Assuming a wCDM model (i.e. with a free parameter for the dark energy equation of state) and equivalent scale cuts to mitigate nonlinear effects, this leads to 40% increase in the figure of merit for the pair combinations of ωm, w, and σ8, and gains of 16% in σ8, 10% in ωm, and 12% in w. Similarly, in ΛCDM, we find an improvement of 19% and 27% on σ8 and ωm, respectively. We also explore flux-limited samples with a flat magnitude cut finding that the optimal selection, i<22.2, has ∼7 times more galaxies and ∼20% wider redshift distributions compared to MagLim, but slightly worse constraints. We show that our results are robust with respect to the assumed galaxy bias and photometric redshift uncertainties with only moderate further gains from increased number of tomographic bins or the inclusion of bin cross-correlations, except in the case of the flux-limited sample, for which these gains are more significant. © 2021 American Physical Society.ISSN
2470-0010EISSN
2470-0029Version
Final published versionSponsors
University of Nottinghamae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1103/physrevd.103.043503