Benchmark dose risk analysis with mixed‐factor quantal data in environmental risk assessment
Affiliation
BIO5 Institute and Graduate Interdisciplinary Program in Statistics & Data Science, University of ArizonaBIO5 Institute, Department of Mathematics, and Graduate Interdisciplinary Program in Statistics & Data Science, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2021-03-09Keywords
benchmark analysisBMDL
lower confidence limits
quantal response data
quantitative risk assessment
simultaneous inferences
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
WileyCitation
Sans‐Fuentes, M. A., & Piegorsch, W. W. Benchmark dose risk analysis with mixed‐factor quantal data in environmental risk assessment. Environmetrics, e2677.Journal
EnvironmetricsRights
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Benchmark analysis is a general risk estimation strategy for identifying the benchmark dose (BMD) past which the risk of exhibiting an adverse environmental response exceeds a fixed, target value of benchmark response. Estimation of BMD and of its lower confidence limit (BMDL) is well understood for the case of an adverse response to a single stimulus. In many environmental settings, however, one or more additional, secondary, qualitative factor(s) may collude to affect the adverse outcome, such that the risk changes with differential levels of the secondary factor. This article extends the single-dose BMD paradigm to a mixed-factor setting with a secondary qualitative factor possessing two levels. With focus on quantal-response data and using a generalized linear model with a complementary-log link function, we derive expressions for BMD and BMDL. We study the operating characteristics of six different multiplicity-adjusted approaches to calculate the BMDL, using Monte Carlo evaluations. We illustrate the calculations via an example dataset from environmental carcinogenicity testing. © 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Note
12 month embargo; first published: 09 March 2021ISSN
1180-4009EISSN
1099-095XDOI
10.1002/env.2677Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/env.2677