• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Faculty Research
    • UA Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Faculty Research
    • UA Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Comparison of Methods for Measuring Cyclodeviation

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Combined torsion MS 11-12-20 ...
    Size:
    237.8Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Final Accepted Manuscript
    Download
    Author
    Liebermann, Laura
    Hatt, Sarah R
    Leske, David A
    Klaehn, Lindsay D
    Kramer, Andrea M
    Holmes, Jonathan M
    Affiliation
    Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of Arizona
    Issue Date
    2020-11-27
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    Elsevier Inc.
    Citation
    Liebermann, L., Hatt, S. R., Leske, D. A., Klaehn, L. D., Kramer, A. M., & Holmes, J. M. (2021). Comparison of Methods for Measuring Cyclodeviation. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 224, 332-342.
    Journal
    American Journal of Ophthalmology
    Rights
    Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Collection Information
    This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
    Abstract
    Synoptophore cross-in-circle targets and the largest (of right or left) single-Maddox rod values were similar to double-Maddox values (mean differences: -1.2° and 0.1°, respectively; ICC: 0.79 and 0.82, respectively). Synoptophore house targets measured less excyclodeviation (mean difference: -2.7°; ICC: 0.71). Mean summed single-Maddox rod values were somewhat similar to double-Maddox values (mean difference: 1.5°; ICC: 0.85), but differences increased with greater cyclodeviation (r2 = 0.2678; P < .001). Fundus photographs showed large, uncorrelated differences compared with double-Maddox rod test, when summing right and left eyes and when using the largest of right or left (mean differences: 12.2° and 6.2°; ICC: -0.02 and 0.21, respectively), and differences increased with greater cyclodeviation (r2 = 0.4094; P < .001 and r2 = .1143; P= .03, respectively).
    Note
    12 month embargo; first published online 27 November 2020
    ISSN
    0002-9394
    EISSN
    1879-1891
    PubMed ID
    33253661
    DOI
    10.1016/j.ajo.2020.11.005
    Version
    Final accepted manuscript
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.ajo.2020.11.005
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UA Faculty Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Test-retest variability of cyclodeviations measured using the double Maddox rod test.
    • Authors: Liebermann L, Leske DA, Hatt SR, Holmes JM
    • Issue date: 2018 Apr
    • Reliability and agreement analysis among 5 subjective methods of ocular torsion measurement.
    • Authors: Llorente-La Orden C, Hernández-García E, Díaz-Isabel E, Burgos-Blasco B, Morales-Fernández L, Merino-Sanz P, Gómez de Liaño-Sánchez R
    • Issue date: 2022 Aug
    • Cyclotorsion Measured in a Patient Population Using Three Different Methods: A Comparative Study.
    • Authors: Flodin S, Karlsson P, Andersson Grönlund M
    • Issue date: 2016
    • Color dissociation artifacts in double Maddox rod cyclodeviation testing.
    • Authors: Simons K, Arnoldi K, Brown MH
    • Issue date: 1994 Dec
    • [Comparison of five methods for subjective assessment of ocular cyclodeviation].
    • Authors: Klainguti G, Strickler J, Chamero J
    • Issue date: 1992 May
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.