Name:
Combined torsion MS 11-12-20 ...
Size:
237.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Author
Liebermann, LauraHatt, Sarah R
Leske, David A
Klaehn, Lindsay D
Kramer, Andrea M
Holmes, Jonathan M
Affiliation
Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2020-11-27
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier Inc.Citation
Liebermann, L., Hatt, S. R., Leske, D. A., Klaehn, L. D., Kramer, A. M., & Holmes, J. M. (2021). Comparison of Methods for Measuring Cyclodeviation. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 224, 332-342.Rights
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Synoptophore cross-in-circle targets and the largest (of right or left) single-Maddox rod values were similar to double-Maddox values (mean differences: -1.2° and 0.1°, respectively; ICC: 0.79 and 0.82, respectively). Synoptophore house targets measured less excyclodeviation (mean difference: -2.7°; ICC: 0.71). Mean summed single-Maddox rod values were somewhat similar to double-Maddox values (mean difference: 1.5°; ICC: 0.85), but differences increased with greater cyclodeviation (r2 = 0.2678; P < .001). Fundus photographs showed large, uncorrelated differences compared with double-Maddox rod test, when summing right and left eyes and when using the largest of right or left (mean differences: 12.2° and 6.2°; ICC: -0.02 and 0.21, respectively), and differences increased with greater cyclodeviation (r2 = 0.4094; P < .001 and r2 = .1143; P= .03, respectively).Note
12 month embargo; first published online 27 November 2020ISSN
0002-9394EISSN
1879-1891PubMed ID
33253661Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.ajo.2020.11.005
