“Drought isn’t just water, it is living”: Narratives of drought vulnerability in California’s San Joaquin Valley
Name:
Greene 2021 Drought Narratives.pdf
Size:
484.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Author
Greene, ChristinaAffiliation
Climate Assessment for the Southwest, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2021-02-28
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier LtdCitation
Greene, C. (2021). “Drought isn’t just water, it is living”: Narratives of drought vulnerability in California’s San Joaquin Valley. Geoforum, 121, 33-43.Journal
GeoforumRights
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Drought vulnerability studies in the United States primarily focus on biophysical and economic indicators and overlook the multiple ways drought is experienced socially. This research examines the human dimensions of drought through narratives of drought vulnerability in the agricultural communities of California's San Joaquin Valley during the 2012–2016 drought. Four narratives are identified that reveal the lived experiences and local knowledges of drought as well as the multiple understandings of the political, economic, social, and environmental processes that produce drought vulnerability. The narratives explain the production of drought across long timescales that include both memories of historical events as well as visions of desired futures for the region. Who is vulnerable and why differs across the narratives, with each narrative offering competing understandings for how the relationships between water, agriculture, labor, and rural communities create drought vulnerability. Which narrative becomes dominant and embedded in water governance has impacts on the practice of agriculture as well as social and environmental justice for farmworkers and rural community members. © 2021 Elsevier LtdNote
24 month embargo; first published online 28 February 2021ISSN
0016-7185Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
National Institute of Food and Agricultureae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.02.007
