Association of Gender and Race With Allocation of Advanced Heart Failure Therapies
Name:
breathett_2020_oi_200432.pdf
Size:
910.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Breathett, KhadijahYee, Erika
Pool, Natalie
Hebdon, Megan
Crist, Janice D.
Yee, Ryan H.
Knapp, Shannon M.
Solola, Sade
Luy, Luis
Herrera-Theut, Kathryn
Zabala, Leanne
Stone, Jeff
McEwen, Marylyn M.
Calhoun, Elizabeth
Sweitzer, Nancy K.
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Sarver Heart Ctr, Dept Med, Div CardiolUniv Arizona, Sarver Heart Ctr, Clin Res Off
Univ Arizona, Coll Nursing
Univ Arizona, Bio5 Inst, Stat Consulting Lab
Univ Arizona, Dept Med
Univ Arizona, Med Sch
Univ Arizona, Dept Psychol
Univ Arizona, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci
Issue Date
2020-07
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
AMER MEDICAL ASSOCCitation
Breathett K, Yee E, Pool N, et al. Association of Gender and Race With Allocation of Advanced Heart Failure Therapies. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(7):e2011044. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11044Journal
JAMA NETWORK OPENRights
© 2020 Breathett K et al. JAMA Network Open. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
This qualitative study examines how patient race and gender are associated with clinician recommendations for allocation of advanced heart failure therapies. Importance Racial bias is associated with the allocation of advanced heart failure therapies, heart transplants, and ventricular assist devices. It is unknown whether gender and racial biases are associated with the allocation of advanced therapies among women. Objective To determine whether the intersection of patient gender and race is associated with the decision-making of clinicians during the allocation of advanced heart failure therapies. Design, Setting, and Participants In this qualitative study, 46 US clinicians attending a conference for an international heart transplant organization in April 2019 were interviewed on the allocation of advanced heart failure therapies. Participants were randomized to examine clinical vignettes that varied 1:1 by patient race (African American to white) and 20:3 by gender (women to men) to purposefully target vignettes of women patients to compare with a prior study of vignettes of men patients. Participants were interviewed about their decision-making process using the think-aloud technique and provided supplemental surveys. Interviews were analyzed using grounded theory methodology, and surveys were analyzed with Wilcoxon tests. Exposure Randomization to clinical vignettes. Main Outcomes and Measures Thematic differences in allocation of advanced therapies by patient race and gender. Results Among 46 participants (24 [52%] women, 20 [43%] racial minority), participants were randomized to the vignette of a white woman (20 participants [43%]), an African American woman (20 participants [43%]), a white man (3 participants [7%]), and an African American man (3 participants [7%]). Allocation differences centered on 5 themes. First, clinicians critiqued the appearance of the women more harshly than the men as part of their overall impressions. Second, the African American man was perceived as experiencing more severe illness than individuals from other racial and gender groups. Third, there was more concern regarding appropriateness of prior care of the African American woman compared with the white woman. Fourth, there were greater concerns about adequacy of social support for the women than for the men. Children were perceived as liabilities for women, particularly the African American woman. Family dynamics and finances were perceived to be greater concerns for the African American woman than for individuals in the other vignettes; spouses were deemed inadequate support for women. Last, participants recommended ventricular assist devices over transplantation for all racial and gender groups. Surveys revealed no statistically significant differences in allocation recommendations for African American and white women patients. Conclusions and Relevance This national study of health care professionals randomized to clinical vignettes that varied only by gender and race found evidence of gender and race bias in the decision-making process for offering advanced therapies for heart failure, particularly for African American women patients, who were judged more harshly by appearance and adequacy of social support. There was no associated between patient gender and race and final recommendations for allocation of advanced therapies. However, it is possible that bias may contribute to delayed allocation and ultimately inequity in the allocation of advanced therapies in a clinical setting. Question Is bias against a patient's gender and race associated with the allocation of advanced heart failure therapies? Findings In a qualitative study of 46 health care professionals, there was more bias against women compared with men when evaluating appearance and social support, particularly among African American women. Final recommendations were not different for groups defined by gender or race; all were offered ventricular assist devices rather than transplantation during interviews. Meaning Although gender and race were not associated with allocation of advanced heart failure therapies in this study, there was evidence of bias, which could contribute to delayed and lower allocation of advanced therapies to women.Note
Open access journalISSN
2574-3805PubMed ID
32692370Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11044
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2020 Breathett K et al. JAMA Network Open. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
Related articles
- Does Race Influence Decision Making for Advanced Heart Failure Therapies?
- Authors: Breathett K, Yee E, Pool N, Hebdon M, Crist JD, Knapp S, Larsen A, Solola S, Luy L, Herrera-Theut K, Zabala L, Stone J, McEwen MM, Calhoun E, Sweitzer NK
- Issue date: 2019 Nov 19
- Group Dynamics and Allocation of Advanced Heart Failure Therapies-Heart Transplants and Ventricular Assist Devices-By Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Group.
- Authors: Breathett K, Yee R, Pool N, Thomas Hebdon MC, Knapp SM, Herrera-Theut K, de Groot E, Yee E, Allen LA, Hasan A, Lindenfeld J, Calhoun E, Carnes M, Sweitzer NK
- Issue date: 2023 Mar 7
- Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
- Authors: Crider K, Williams J, Qi YP, Gutman J, Yeung L, Mai C, Finkelstain J, Mehta S, Pons-Duran C, Menéndez C, Moraleda C, Rogers L, Daniels K, Green P
- Issue date: 2022 Feb 1
- Differences in Donor Heart Acceptance by Race and Gender of Patients on the Transplant Waiting List.
- Authors: Breathett K, Knapp SM, Lewsey SC, Mohammed SF, Mazimba S, Dunlay SM, Hicks A, Ilonze OJ, Morris AA, Tedford RJ, Colvin MM, Daly RC
- Issue date: 2024 Apr 23
- Gender and Race Differences in HeartMate3 Left Ventricular Assist Device as a Bridge to Transplantation.
- Authors: Steinberg RS, Okoh AK, Wang J, Patel KJ, Gangavelli A, Nayak A, Ko YA, Gupta D, Daneshmand M, Vega JD, Morris AA
- Issue date: 2024 Aug

