Biotic soil-plant interaction processes explain most of hysteric soil CO2 efflux response to temperature in cross-factorial mesocosm experiment
Name:
s41598-019-55390-6.pdf
Size:
2.509Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Dusza, YannSanchez-Canete, Enrique P.
Le Galliard, Jean-Francois
Ferriere, Regis
Chollet, Simon
Massol, Florent
Hansart, Amandine
Juarez, Sabrina
Dontsova, Katerina
van Haren, Joost
Troch, Peter
Pavao-Zuckerman, Mitchell A.
Hamerlynck, Erik
Barron-Gafford, Greg A.
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary BiolUniv Arizona, Biosphere 2, Off Res Dev & Innovat
Univ Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Atmospher Sci
Univ Arizona, Sch Geog & Dev
Issue Date
2020-01
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUPCitation
Dusza, Y., Sanchez-Cañete, E.P., Galliard, JF.L. et al. Biotic soil-plant interaction processes explain most of hysteretic soil CO2 efflux response to temperature in cross-factorial mesocosm experiment. Sci Rep 10, 905 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55390-6Journal
SCIENTIFIC REPORTSRights
© The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Ecosystem carbon flux partitioning is strongly influenced by poorly constrained soil CO2 efflux (F-soil). Simple model applications (Arrhenius and Q(10)) do not account for observed diel hysteresis between F-soil and soil temperature. How this hysteresis emerges and how it will respond to variation in vegetation or soil moisture remains unknown. We used an ecosystem-level experimental system to independently control potential abiotic and biotic drivers of the F-soil-T hysteresis. We hypothesized a principally biological cause for the hysteresis. Alternatively, F-soil hysteresis is primarily driven by thermal convection through the soil profile. We conducted experiments under normal, fluctuating diurnal soil temperatures and under conditions where we held soil temperature near constant. We found (i) significant and nearly equal amplitudes of hysteresis regardless of soil temperature regime, and (ii) the amplitude of hysteresis was most closely tied to baseline rates of F-soil, which were mostly driven by photosynthetic rates. Together, these findings suggest a more biologically-driven mechanism associated with photosynthate transport in yielding the observed patterns of soil CO2 efflux being out of sync with soil temperature. These findings should be considered on future partitioning models of ecosystem respiration.Note
Open access journalISSN
2045-2322PubMed ID
31969580Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1038/s41598-019-55390-6
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Related articles
- Contrasting diel hysteresis between soil autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration in a desert ecosystem under different rainfall scenarios.
- Authors: Song W, Chen S, Zhou Y, Wu B, Zhu Y, Lu Q, Lin G
- Issue date: 2015 Nov 30
- Patterns and determinants of soil CO(2) efflux in major forest types of Central Himalayas, India.
- Authors: Kaushal S, Rao KS, Uniyal PL, Baishya R
- Issue date: 2023 Jun 23
- Natural variations in snow cover do not affect the annual soil CO2 efflux from a mid-elevation temperate forest.
- Authors: Schindlbacher A, Jandl R, Schindlbacher S
- Issue date: 2014 Feb
- Sustained effects of atmospheric [CO2] and nitrogen availability on forest soil CO2 efflux.
- Authors: Oishi AC, Palmroth S, Johnsen KH, McCarthy HR, Oren R
- Issue date: 2014 Apr
- Shifts in microbial trophic strategy explain different temperature sensitivity of CO2 flux under constant and diurnally varying temperature regimes.
- Authors: Bai Z, Xie H, Kao-Kniffin J, Chen B, Shao P, Liang C
- Issue date: 2017 May 1

