The hazardous 2017-2019 surge and river damming by Shispare Glacier, Karakoram
Name:
s41598-020-61277-8.pdf
Size:
4.768Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Bhambri, RakeshWatson, C. Scott
Hewitt, Kenneth
Haritashya, Umesh K.
Kargel, Jeffrey S.
Shahi, Arjun Pratap
Chand, Pritam
Kumar, Amit
Verma, Akshaya
Govil, Himanshu
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Atmospher SciIssue Date
2020-03
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUPCitation
Bhambri, R., Watson, C.S., Hewitt, K. et al. The hazardous 2017–2019 surge and river damming by Shispare Glacier, Karakoram. Sci Rep 10, 4685 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61277-8Journal
SCIENTIFIC REPORTSRights
© The Author(s) 2020. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
In 2017-2019 a surge of Shispare Glacier, a former tributary of the once larger Hasanabad Glacier (Hunza region), dammed the proglacial river of Muchuhar Glacier, which formed an ice-dammed lake and generated a small Glacial Lake Outburst Flood (GLOF). Surge movement produced the highest recorded Karakoram glacier surface flow rate using feature tracking (similar to 18 +/- 0.5 m d(-1)) and resulted in a glacier frontal advance of 1495 +/- 47 m. The surge speed was less than reports of earlier Hasanabad advances during 1892/93 (9.3 km) and 1903 (9.7 km). Surges also occurred in 1973 and 2000-2001. Recent surges and lake evolution are examined using feature tracking in satellite images (1990-2019), DEM differencing (1973-2019), and thermal satellite data (2000-2019). The recent active phase of Shispare surge began in April 2018, showed two surface flow maxima in June 2018 and May 2019, and terminated following a GLOF on 22-23 June 2019. The surge likely had hydrological controls influenced in winter by compromised subglacial flow and low meltwater production. It terminated during summer probably because increased meltwater restored efficient channelized flow. We also identify considerable heterogeneity of movement, including spring/summer accelerations.Note
Open access journalISSN
2045-2322PubMed ID
32170170Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1038/s41598-020-61277-8
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.