Parametric removal rate survey study and numerical modeling for deterministic optics manufacturing
Author
Negi, Vipender SinghGarg, Harry
Kumar, Shravan R. R.
Karar, Vinod
Tiwari, Umesh Kumar
Kim, Dae Wook
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, James C Wyant Coll Opt SciUniv Arizona, Dept Astron
Univ Arizona, Steward Observ
Issue Date
2020-08
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
OPTICAL SOC AMERCitation
Negi, V. S., Garg, H., Rr, S. K., Karar, V., Tiwari, U. K., & Kim, D. W. (2020). Parametric removal rate survey study and numerical modeling for deterministic optics manufacturing. Optics Express, 28(18), 26733-26749.Journal
OPTICS EXPRESSRights
© 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Surface errors directly affect the performance of optical systems in terms of contrast and resolution. Surface figure errors at different surface scales are deterministically removed using controlled material removal rate (MRR) during a precision optics fabrication process. We systematically sectioned the wide range of MRR space with systematic parameters and experimentally evaluated and mapped the MRR values using a flexible membrane-polishing tool. We performed numerical analysis with a tool influence function model using a distributed MRR-based Preston's constant evaluation approach. The analysis procedure was applied to a series of experimental data along with the tool influence function models to evaluate removal rates. In order to provide referenceable survey data without entangled information, we designed the experiments using Taguchi's L27 orthogonal array involving five control parameters and statistically analyzed a large number of programmatic experiments. The analysis of variance showed that the most significant parameters for achieving a higher MRR are the spot size and active diameter. (C) 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing AgreementNote
Open access journalISSN
1094-4087PubMed ID
32906942Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1364/OE.399105
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Study on Material Removal Model by Reciprocating Magnetorheological Polishing.
- Authors: Wang R, Xiu S, Sun C, Li S, Kong X
- Issue date: 2021 Apr 8
- Model of the material removal function and an experimental study on a magnetorheological finishing process using a small ball-end permanent-magnet polishing head.
- Authors: Chen M, Liu H, Cheng J, Yu B, Fang Z
- Issue date: 2017 Jul 1
- Orthogonal Experimental Research on Dielectrophoresis Polishing (DEPP) of Silicon Wafer.
- Authors: Zhao T, Deng Q, Zhang C, Feng K, Zhou Z, Yuan J
- Issue date: 2020 May 27
- Parametric modeling of edge effects for polishing tool influence functions.
- Authors: Kim DW, Park WH, Kim SW, Burge JH
- Issue date: 2009 Mar 30
- Multiresponse Optimization of Process Parameters in Turning of GFRP Using TOPSIS Method.
- Authors: Parida AK, Routara BC
- Issue date: 2014
