Assessment of Satellite and Reanalysis Cold Season Snowfall Estimates Over Arctic Sea Ice
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Atmospher Sci EngnIssue Date
2020-08Keywords
satellite precipitation estimatesreanalysis precipitation estimates
reconstruction of snow depth
Arctic sea ice
operational ice bridge
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNIONCitation
Song, Y., Behrangi, A., & Blanchard‐Wrigglesworth, E. (2020). Assessment of Satellite and Reanalysis Cold Season Snowfall Estimates Over Arctic Sea Ice. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(16), e2020GL088970.Journal
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERSRights
© 2020 American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
This work presents a systematic assessment of precipitation estimates from satellite and reanalysis products over Arctic sea ice by reconstructing snow depths from precipitation products and comparing them with snow depth observations from National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)'s Operation IceBridge (OIB). Results show that the observed snow depth pattern is generally captured through reconstruction of snow depth using various precipitation products, but the use of passive microwave precipitation estimates results in significant underestimation of the snow depth. By using CloudSat monthly precipitation rate, to adjust the Global Precipitation Climatology Product (GPCP V1.3), the modified product (GPCP V1.3-mod) shows improved statistics over GPCP V1.3 as compared with OIB snow depth observations. Snow depth reconstructed from ERA-Int precipitation rate outperformed other products by showing the highest correlation coefficient and lowest root-mean-square error (RMSE). ERA5 shows largerRMSEthan ERA-Int, while MERRA-2 results in large overestimation of snow depth and largerRMSEcompared to GPCP and other reanalysis products.Note
6 month embargo; first published online 08 July 2020ISSN
0094-8276EISSN
1944-8007Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1029/2020GL088970
