A New Crater Near InSight: Implications for Seismic Impact Detectability on Mars
Author
Daubar, I. J.Lognonne, P.
Teanby, N. A.
Collins, G. S.
Clinton, J.
Staehler, S.
Spiga, A.
Karakostas, F.
Ceylan, S.
Malin, M.
McEwen, A. S.
Maguire, R.
Charalambous, C.
Onodera, K.
Lucas, A.
Rolland, L.
Vaubaillon, J.
Kawamura, T.
Boese, M.
Horleston, A.
van Driel, M.
Stevanovic, J.
Miljkovic, K.
Fernando, B.
Huang, Q.
Giardini, D.
Larmat, C. S.
Leng, K.
Rajsic, A.
Schmerr, N.
Wojcicka, N.
Pike, T.
Wookey, J.
Rodriguez, S.
Garcia, R.
Banks, M. E.
Margerin, L.
Posiolova, L.
Banerdt, B.
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Lunar & Planetary LabIssue Date
2020-08
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNIONCitation
Daubar, I. J., Lognonné, P., Teanby, N. A., Collins, G. S., Clinton, J., Stähler, S., ... & Banerdt, B. (2020). A New Crater Near InSight: Implications for Seismic Impact Detectability on Mars. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 125(8), e2020JE006382.Rights
© 2020 American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
A new 1.5 m diameter impact crater was discovered on Mars only similar to 40 km from the InSight lander. Context camera images constrained its formation between 21 February and 6 April 2019; follow-up High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment images resolved the crater. During this time period, three seismic events were identified in InSight data. We derive expected seismic signal characteristics and use them to evaluate each of the seismic events. However, none of them can definitively be associated with this source. Atmospheric perturbations are generally expected to be generated during impacts; however, in this case, no signal could be identified as related to the known impact. Using scaling relationships based on the terrestrial and lunar analogs and numerical modeling, we predict the amplitude, peak frequency, and duration of the seismic signal that would have emanated from this impact. The predicted amplitude falls near the lowest levels of the measured seismometer noise for the predicted frequency. Hence, it is not surprising this impact event was not positively identified in the seismic data. Finding this crater was a lucky event as its formation this close to InSight has a probability of only similar to 0.2, and the odds of capturing it in before and after images are extremely low. We revisit impact-seismic discriminators in light of real experience with a seismometer on the Martian surface. Using measured noise of the instrument, we revise our previous prediction of seismic impact detections downward, from similar to a few to tens, to just similar to 2 per Earth year, still with an order of magnitude uncertainty.Note
6 month embargo; first published online 11 July 2020ISSN
2169-9097EISSN
2169-9100Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1029/2020JE006382
