Integrating Touchscreen-Based Geriatric Assessment and Frailty Screening for Adults With Multiple Myeloma to Drive Personalized Treatment Decisions
Author
Nathwani, NityaKurtin, Sandra E
Lipe, Brea
Mohile, Supriya Gupta
Catamero, Donna D
Wujcik, Debra
Birchard, Kristy
Davis, Agnes
Dudley, William
Tompkins Stricker, Carrie
Wildes, Tanya Marya
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Ctr CancIssue Date
2019-11-25
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGYCitation
Nathwani, N., Kurtin, S. E., Lipe, B., Mohile, S. G., Catamero, D. D., Wujcik, D., ... & Wildes, T. M. (2020). Integrating touchscreen-based geriatric assessment and frailty screening for adults with multiple myeloma to drive personalized treatment decisions. JCO oncology practice, 16(1), e92-e99.Journal
JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICERights
© 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Patients were white (72%; n = 86), mean age was 72 years (range, 65-85 years), and averaged 7.71 minutes (range, 2-17 minutes) for survey completion. Providers averaged 3.2 minutes (range, 1-10 minutes) to review mGA results. Using International Myeloma Working Group frailty score, patients were fit (39%; n = 64), intermediate fit (33%; n = 55), or frail (28%; n = 46). Providers selected more aggressive treatments in 16.3% of patients and decreased treatment intensity in 34% of patients; treatment intensification was more common for fit patients and milder treatments for frail patients (χ2 = 20.02; P < .0001). Transplant eligibility significantly correlated with fit status and transplant ineligibility with frail status (P = .004). Outcomes on 144 patients 3 months post study visit showed 19.4% (n = 28) had grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicities, 38.9% (n = 56) had dose modifications, and 18% (n = 26) had early therapy cessation.Note
12 month embargo; first published online 25 November 2019ISSN
2688-1527EISSN
2688-1535PubMed ID
31765266Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1200/JOP.19.00208
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Assessing frailty in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A comparison between the patient-reported frailty phenotype and the International Myeloma Working Group frailty index.
- Authors: Krepper D, Sparano F, Giesinger JM, Gaidano G, Niscola P, Codeluppi K, Antonioli E, Califano C, Floro L, Annibali O, Fozza C, Tafuri A, Mazza P, Potenza L, Vignetti M, Cavo M, Petrucci MT, Efficace F
- Issue date: 2025 Jul
- Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.
- Authors: Preuss CV, Kalava A, King KC
- Issue date: 2025 Jan
- Gait parameters and daily physical activity for distinguishing pre-frail, frail, and non-frail older adults: A scoping review.
- Authors: Zhang X, Li F, Hobbelen HS, van Munster BC, Lamoth CJ
- Issue date: 2025 Jul
- Nutritional risk and adverse health outcomes in Chinese community-dwelling older adults: A study based on the Elderly Nutritional Indicators for Geriatric Malnutrition Assessment (ENIGMA).
- Authors: Wei K, Wang H, Yang J, Lin S, Li C
- Issue date: 2024 Oct
- Preconditioning Frailty Phenotype Influences Survival and Relapse for Older Allogeneic Transplantation Recipients.
- Authors: Sung AD, Koll T, Gier SH, Racioppi A, White G, Lew M, Free M, Agarwal P, Bohannon LM, Johnson EJ, Selvan B, Babushok DV, Frey NV, Gill SI, Hexner EO, Martin M, Perl AE, Pratz KW, Luger SM, Chao NJ, Fisher AL, Stadtmauer EA, Porter DL, Loren AW, Bhatt VR, Gimotty PA, McCurdy SR
- Issue date: 2024 Apr
