Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, Volume 38
ABOUT THIS COLLECTION
The Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law is published three times annually by the students of the James E. Rogers College of Law at the University of Arizona. The Journal publishes articles on a wide variety of international and comparative law topics in order to provide a forum for debate on current issues affecting international legal development including international and comparative law issues and tribal/indigenous peoples law.
The Journal has three major goals: to provide an opportunity for all members to publish articles on international and comparative law topics, to serve the publication needs of the Arizona Bar Association with respect to international law, and to provide practitioners, judges, and governmental bodies with a central source of information on international topics that increasingly arise in practice.
QUESTIONS?
Visit the Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law website for more information.
Collections in this community
Recent Submissions
-
Title PageThe University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law (Tucson, AZ), 2022
-
Table of ContentsThe University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law (Tucson, AZ), 2022
-
Incentivizing Private Antitrust Enforcement to Promote Leniency Applications: A Case Study of the United Kingdom [Article]Many jurisdictions around the world are promoting private antitrust enforcement. However, currently, the dominant view is that private actions discourage leniency application, an important source for antitrust authorities to detect and combat cartels. Such a view hinders the development of private enforcement. In a separate theoretical work, based on a game theory model created by Professor Joseph E. Harrington, I discovered that private enforcement does not always have a negative impact on leniency application. Further, I argue that, instead, private enforcement, when used “properly,” could serve as a tool to promote leniency application. The current article offers a case study to support the theoretical work. To do so, I studied the 2014 Consumer Rights Bill in the U.K. which partly aimed at promoting private actions. Using Germany as the control group, I have conducted a difference-in-difference analysis and found around a 50% rise in leniency application in the U.K. following the introduction of said bill.
-
Table of ContentsThe University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law (Tucson, AZ), 2021
-
Title PageThe University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law (Tucson, AZ), 2021