No significant correlation between radial velocity planet presence and debris disc properties
Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESSCitation
Yelverton, B., Kennedy, G. M., & Su, K. Y. (2020). No significant correlation between radial velocity planet presence and debris disc properties. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 495(2), 1943-1957.Rights
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We investigate whether the tentative correlation between planets and debris discs which has been previously identified can be confirmed at high significance. We compile a sample of 201 stars with known planets and existing far-infrared observations. The sample is larger than those studied previously since we include targets from an unpublished Herschel survey of planet hosts. We use spectral energy distribution modelling to characterize Kuiper belt analogue debris discs within the sample, then compare the properties of the discs against a control sample of 294 stars without known planets. Survival analysis suggests that there is a significant (p similar to 0.002) difference between the disc fractional luminosity distributions of the two samples. However, this is largely a result of the fact that the control sample contains a higher proportion of close binaries and of later-type stars; both of these factors are known to reduce disc detection rates. Considering only Sun-like stars without close binary companions in each sample greatly reduces the significance of the difference (p similar to 0.3). We also find no evidence for a difference in the disc fractional luminosities of stars hosting planets more or less massive than Saturn (p similar to 0.9). Finally, we find that the planet hosts have cooler discs than the control stars, but this is likely a detection bias, since the warmest discs in the control sample are also the faintest, and would thus be undetectable around the more distant planet hosts. Considering only discs in each sample that could have been detected around a typical planet host, we find p similar to 0.07 for the temperatures.ISSN
0035-8711EISSN
1365-2966Version
Final published versionSponsors
Science and Technology Facilities Councilae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1093/mnras/staa1316
