Adjusting statistical benchmark risk analysis to account for non-spatial autocorrelation, with application to natural hazard risk assessment
Affiliation
Interdisciplinary Program in Statistics & Data Science, University of ArizonaBIO5 Institute, University of Arizona
Department of Mathematics, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2021-04-01Keywords
Benchmark dosecentered autologistic model
maximum pseudo-likelihood
natural hazard vulnerability
non-spatial autocorrelation
quantitative risk assessment
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Taylor and Francis Ltd.Citation
Liu, J., Piegorsch, W. W., Schissler, A. G., McCaster, R. R., & Cutter, S. L. (2021). Adjusting statistical benchmark risk analysis to account for non-spatial autocorrelation, with application to natural hazard risk assessment. Journal of Applied Statistics, 1-21.Journal
Journal of Applied StatisticsRights
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We develop and study a quantitative, interdisciplinary strategy for conducting statistical risk analyses within the ‘benchmark risk’ paradigm of contemporary risk assessment when potential autocorrelation exists among sample units. We use the methodology to explore information on vulnerability to natural hazards across 3108 counties in the conterminous 48 US states, applying a place-based resilience index to an existing knowledgebase of hazardous incidents and related human casualties. An extension of a centered autologistic regression model is applied to relate local, county-level vulnerability to hazardous outcomes. Adjustments for autocorrelation embedded in the resiliency information are applied via a novel, non-spatial neighborhood structure. Statistical risk-benchmarking techniques are then incorporated into the modeling framework, wherein levels of high and low vulnerability to hazards are identified. © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.Note
12 month embargo; first published online 1 April 2021ISSN
0266-4763EISSN
1360-0532Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciencesae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/02664763.2021.1904385