Validation of a brief scale to assess ambulatory patients' perceptions of reading visit notes: a scale development study
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Clin Data Analyt & Decis SupportIssue Date
2020-10-20Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUPCitation
Wright, J. A., Leveille, S. G., Chimowitz, H., Fossa, A., Stametz, R., Clarke, D., & Walker, J. (2020). Validation of a brief scale to assess ambulatory patients’ perceptions of reading visit notes: a scale development study. BMJ Open, 10(10), e034517.Journal
BMJ OPENRights
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Study 1 resulted in the selection of a 10-point importance response option format over a 4-point agreement scale. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) in study 2 resulted in two-factor solution: a four-item benefits factor with good reliability (alpha=0.83) and a three-item risks factor with poor reliability (alpha=0.52). The factor structure was confirmed in study 3, and confirmatory factor analysis of benefit items resulted in an excellent fitting model, X2(2)=2.949; confirmatory factor index=0.998; root mean square error of approximation=0.04 (0.00, 0.142); loadings 0.68-0.86; alpha=0.88. Study 4 supported configural, measurement and structural invariance for the benefits scale across high and low-education patient groups.Note
Open access journalISSN
2044-6055EISSN
2044-6055PubMed ID
33082176Version
Final published versionScopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC.