Automated Design of CubeSats using Evolutionary Algorithm for Trade Space Selection
Name:
aerospace-07-00142.pdf
Size:
4.936Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Aerosp & Mech Engn Dept, Space & Terr Robot Explorat SpaceTREx LabIssue Date
2020-09-28
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
MDPICitation
Kalita, H., & Thangavelautham, J. (2020). Automated Design of CubeSats using Evolutionary Algorithm for Trade Space Selection. Aerospace, 7(10), 142.Journal
AEROSPACERights
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The miniaturization of electronics, sensors, and actuators has enabled the growing use of nanosatellites for earth observation, astrophysics, and even interplanetary missions. This rise of nanosatellites has led to the development of an inventory of modular, interchangeable commercially-off-the-shelf (COTS) components by a multitude of commercial vendors. As a result, the capability of combining subsystems in a compact platform has considerably advanced in the last decade. However, to ascertain these spacecraft's maximum capabilities in terms of mass, volume, and power, there is an important need to optimize their design. Current spacecraft design methods need engineering experience and judgements made by of a team of experts, which can be labor intensive and might lead to a sub-optimal design. In this work we present a compelling alternative approach using machine learning to identify near-optimal solutions to extend the capabilities of a design team. The approach enables automated design of a spacecraft that requires developing a virtual warehouse of components and specifying quantitative goals to produce a candidate design. The near-optimal solutions found through this approach would be a credible starting point for the design team that will need further study to determine their implementation feasibility.Note
Open access journalISSN
2226-4310EISSN
2226-4310Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3390/aerospace7100142
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).