Improving Time Step Convergence in an Atmosphere Model With Simplified Physics: The Impacts of Closure Assumption and Process Coupling
Author
Wan, HuiWoodward, Carol S.
Zhang, Shixuan
Vogl, Christopher J.
Stinis, Panos
Gardner, David J.
Rasch, Philip J.
Zeng, Xubin

Larson, Vincent E.
Singh, Balwinder
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Atmospher SciIssue Date
2020-09-15
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNIONCitation
Wan, H., Woodward, C. S., Zhang, S., Vogl, C. J., Stinis, P., Gardner, D. J., ... & Singh, B. (2020). Improving Time Step Convergence in an Atmosphere Model With Simplified Physics: The Impacts of Closure Assumption and Process Coupling. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12(10), e2019MS001982.Rights
© 2020. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Convergence testing is a common practice in the development of dynamical cores of atmospheric models but is not as often exercised for the parameterization of subgrid physics. An earlier study revealed that the stratiform cloud parameterizations in several predecessors of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) showed strong time step sensitivity and slower-than-expected convergence when the model's time step was systematically refined. In this work, a simplified atmosphere model is configured that consists of the spectral-element dynamical core of the E3SM atmosphere model coupled with a large-scale condensation parameterization based on commonly used assumptions. This simplified model also resembles E3SM and its predecessors in the numerical implementation of process coupling and shows poor time step convergence in short ensemble tests. We present a formal error analysis to reveal the expected time step convergence rate and the conditions for obtaining such convergence. Numerical experiments are conducted to investigate the root causes of convergence problems. We show that revisions in the process coupling and closure assumption help to improve convergence in short simulations using the simplified model; the same revisions applied to a full atmosphere model lead to significant changes in the simulated long-term climate. This work demonstrates that causes of convergence issues in atmospheric simulations can be understood by combining analyses from physical and mathematical perspectives. Addressing convergence issues can help to obtain a discrete model that is more consistent with the intended representation of the physical phenomena.Note
Open access journalISSN
1942-2466EISSN
1942-2466Version
Final published versionSponsors
BlueCross BlueShield of South Carolina Foundationae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1029/2019ms001982
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2020. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License.