• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Living without Normativity

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    azu_etd_18688_sip1_m.pdf
    Size:
    1.512Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Schwarz, Lucia
    Issue Date
    2021
    Keywords
    Metaethics
    Metaphor
    Nihilism
    Nonnaturalism
    Normativity
    Radical Choice
    Advisor
    Timmons, Mark
    Horgan, Terry
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    The University of Arizona.
    Rights
    Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
    Abstract
    Many philosophers think that morality possesses a particularly robust kind of normativity that other systems of norms, such as etiquette or the rules of chess, lack. My dissertation addresses, first, what exactly this robust normativity is supposed to come down to and, second, the implications for our practical lives if morality ultimately isn’t robustly normative–indeed, if no system of norms is. Regarding the first issue, ethical naturalists believe that the robust normativity ascribed to morality can be captured in fully naturalistic terms; moral facts just are natural facts. On the other hand, metaethical nonnaturalists object that normative properties are just too different from natural ones to be a subset of them. In their view, moral properties are irreducibly normative. I agree with nonnaturalists that robust normativity, if it exists at all, isn’t a naturalistic phenomenon. However, while nonnaturalists provide compelling criticisms of ethical naturalism, they currently lack an informative positive account of the nature of robust normativity that explains how it is different from the purely formal normativity of, say, etiquette. Against this background, my dissertation argues that we can illuminate the elusive concept of robust normativity through metaphors. However, even if we can indeed make sense of robust normativity through metaphors, that leaves open whether robust normativity exists. Some scholars deny the existence of irreducibly normative properties because they consider them to be metaphysically “queer.” Taking such skeptical concerns seriously, I ask: if robust normativity does not exist, what would be the practical implications for our lives? I hold that, in the absence of robust normativity, in an important sense, our practical questions of what to do lack answers. This means that we have to make what some existentialist philosophers call “radical choices,” i.e., spontaneous choices that are not based on pre-existing reasons that could guide our decision-making. However, I suggest that, in the absence of robust normativity, we can rely on our subjective concerns for practical guidance because many of our subjective concerns survive a belief in antirealism about robust normativity and because they enjoy a privileged connection to our motivational system.
    Type
    text
    Electronic Dissertation
    Degree Name
    Ph.D.
    Degree Level
    doctoral
    Degree Program
    Graduate College
    Philosophy
    Degree Grantor
    University of Arizona
    Collections
    Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.