Quantification of corrections for the main lunisolar nutation components and analysis of the free core nutation from VLBI-observed nutation residuals
Affiliation
Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2021-04-23
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLCCitation
Zhu, P., Triana, S.A., Rekier, J. et al. Quantification of corrections for the main lunisolar nutation components and analysis of the free core nutation from VLBI-observed nutation residuals. J Geod 95, 57 (2021).Journal
Journal of GeodesyRights
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The attempt to quantify the corrections of lunisolar nutation components was made after analysis of six sets of Earth’s orientation parameters (EOP). The deviations of the long-term nutation components about IAU2006/IAU2000A precession–nutation model are consistent with the uncertainties suggested by Mathews et al. (J Geophys Res Solid Earth, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000390), but they exceed the errors determined in this work. The corrections are validated using the IERS 14C04 and IVS 19q4e combined solutions. After applying the corrections found in this work to the 14C04 nutation residuals, we analyzed the remaining signals, which contain the signature of the free core nutation (FCN). The eigenperiod of the FCN is fixed to the value derived from the resonance of the non-hydrostatic earth model in a priori. The amplitude of FCN is computed by fitting observations to the empirical model using a sliding window, the length of window is determined by taking into account the interference between those close nutation components and the FCN. In addition, we also fitted the nutation residuals by a viscous damping function; both methods produce the same results in the amplitudes of FCN. The magnitude of the free core nutation bears a “V-shape” distribution, and furthermore, the oscillation of the FCN shows a decay and a steady reinforcement before and after 1999. In order to examine the origin of the modulation in FCN’s magnitude, we briefly analyzed the possible damping or beating mechanism behind it. We diagnosed the magnitude and running phase changes of FCN by comparing it with the occurrence of the transient geomagnetic jerks. The weighted root mean square errors of nutation residuals are minimally reduced about 36 % when the corrections to the 21 nutation components and the FCN signature are considered together.Note
12 month embargo; published: 23 April 2021ISSN
0949-7714EISSN
1432-1394Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
European Research Councilae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s00190-021-01513-9
