Use of Palpation Imaging in Diagnosis of Breast Diseases: A Way to Improve the Detection Rate
Affiliation
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona College of MedicineIssue Date
2020
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Ding, Y., Sun, C., Zhou, Q., Cheng, C., Yan, C., & Wang, B. (2020). Use of Palpation Imaging in Diagnosis of Breast Diseases: A Way to Improve the Detection Rate. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, 26, e927553-1.Journal
Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical researchRights
Copyright © Medical Science Monitor. This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast diseases pose increasing threat to women health as peoples lifestyle changes. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical application value of Palpation Imaging (PI) in the diagnosis of breast diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS From October 2019 to February 2020, 184 patients with 225 breast lesions were examined by using PI, ultrasound, and mammography in the department of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. All cases were confirmed pathologically by core-needle biopsy or excisional biopsy. The cut-off value of the PI tests was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We compared the examination results of PI with ultrasound and mammography to analyze the diagnostic value of PI. RESULTS Pathological examination revealed that 186/225(82.67%) lesions were benign, while 39 were malignant. All 8 parameters of PI were significantly correlated with pathological findings (P<0.05). The best cut-off value for the PI score was 19.5 and the area under the curve (AUC) for the PI was 0.921 (95% CI: 0.874-0.968, P<0.001) with 89.7% sensitivity and 86.0% specificity. PI showed greater sensitivity (89.7%) and its specificity (86.0% vs. 86.4%, P=0.931) and accuracy (86.7% vs. 84.6%, P=0.604) were similar to those of mammography. The combination of 3 types of test is superior to a single examination. The sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 98.8%. CONCLUSIONS PI has high clinical value in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Combination examination has the potential to improve the detection of breast cancer in screening and diagnostic capacities and can be used as a supplement to ultrasound and mammography.Note
Open access journalISSN
1643-3750PubMed ID
33247894Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.12659/MSM.927553
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © Medical Science Monitor. This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

