Circadian Responses to Light-Flash Exposure: Conceptualization and New Data Guiding Future Directions
Affiliation
Department of Psychology, BIO5 Research InstituteUniversity of Arizona
Issue Date
2021
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Frontiers Media S.A.Citation
Wong, K. Y., & Fernandez, F. X. (2021). Circadian Responses to Light-Flash Exposure: Conceptualization and New Data Guiding Future Directions. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 135.Journal
Frontiers in NeurologyRights
Copyright © 2021 Wong and Fernandez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
A growing number of studies document circadian phase-shifting after exposure to millisecond light flashes. When strung together by intervening periods of darkness, these stimuli evoke pacemaker responses rivaling or outmatching those created by steady luminance, suggesting that the circadian system's relationship to light can be contextualized outside the principle of simple dose-dependence. In the current review, we present a brief chronology of this work. We then develop a conceptual model around it that attempts to relate the circadian effects of flashes to a natural integrative process the pacemaker uses to intermittently sample the photic information available at dawn and dusk. Presumably, these snapshots are employed as building blocks in the construction of a coherent representation of twilight the pacemaker consults to orient the next day's physiology (in that way, flash-resetting of pacemaker rhythms might be less an example of a circadian visual illusion and more an example of the kinds of gestalt inferences that the image-forming system routinely makes when identifying objects within the visual field; i.e., closure). We conclude our review with a discussion on the role of cones in the pacemaker's twilight predictions, providing new electrophysiological data suggesting that classical photoreceptors—but not melanopsin—are necessary for millisecond, intermediate-intensity flash responses in ipRGCs (intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells). Future investigations are necessary to confirm this “Cone Sentinel Model” of circadian flash-integration and twilight-prediction, and to further define the contribution of cones vs. rods in transducing pacemaker flash signals. © Copyright © 2021 Wong and Fernandez.Note
Open access journalISSN
1664-2295Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3389/fneur.2021.627550
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2021 Wong and Fernandez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).

