• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Studies on Survival, Effectiveness, and Cost Outcomes of First Line Treatments in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    azu_etd_18779_sip1_m.pdf
    Size:
    1.771Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Al Rawashdh, Neda
    Issue Date
    2021
    Keywords
    Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
    CLL
    Cost
    effectiveness
    efficacy
    first line treatments
    Advisor
    Abraham, Ivo
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    The University of Arizona.
    Rights
    Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
    Embargo
    Release after 06/04/2022
    Abstract
    With the approval of targeted therapies as first line treatments in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines list these agents as monotherapy or combined with immunotherapy as the preferred front-line regimens regardless of age, comorbidity, and 17p deletion/TP53 mutation or IGHV mutation status. Therefore, more challenges in choosing between treatments has been in the clinical practices especially by the absence of direct evidence or real-world data that compare between all treatments. We sought in this research to establish evidence that compares between all treatments in regards of effectiveness, survival, and costs. In an analysis of evaluating survival outcomes using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1985-2017), the relative survival rates, cure proportions and hazard of death rates were significantly improved for patients who followed to the era of advanced therapies. A second analysis of network meta-analysis on all survival curves of the published trials revealed that acalabrutinib-plus-obinutuzumab showed significant differences in the progression free survival (PFS) outcomes when compared with ibrutinib. While ibrutinib was not statistically significant from the other targeted therapies. Among patients with low-risk disease, there was no difference between the PFS of targeted therapies and chemoimmunotherapies, but probable gain in the time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) after administering targeted therapies can be achieved. In last analysis that compared the relative effectiveness with treatment’s costs found that patients who are treated with targeted therapy “venetoclax-plus-obinutuzumab” gain more health benefits and less cost when compared with all chemoimmunotherapies, while the other targeted therapies achieve higher benefits than venetoclax-plus-obinutuzumab but with higher costs. Overall, there are always superiority of targeted agents over chemoimmunotherapies in treating CLL patients, who are older than 65 years or having comorbidities, especially in patients with high-risk disease as having unmutated IGHV or del 17p. Acalabrutinib-plus-obinutuzumab is the combination that achieved the highest effectiveness outcomes in term of PFS and TTNT but with higher costs than others.
    Type
    text
    Electronic Dissertation
    Degree Name
    Ph.D.
    Degree Level
    doctoral
    Degree Program
    Graduate College
    Clinical Translational Sciences
    Degree Grantor
    University of Arizona
    Collections
    Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.