Implementation of snowpack treatment in the cpc water balance model and its impact on drought assessment
Name:
15257541_JournalofHydrometeoro ...
Size:
3.139Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of ArizonaIssue Date
2021
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
American Meteorological SocietyCitation
Arevalo, J., Welty, J., Fan, Y., & Zeng, X. (2021). Implementation of snowpack treatment in the cpc water balance model and its impact on drought assessment. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 22(5), 1235–1247.Journal
Journal of HydrometeorologyRights
Copyright © 2021 American Meteorological Society.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Droughts are a worldwide concern, thus assessment efforts are conducted by many centers around the world, mainly through simple drought indices, which usually neglect important hydrometeorological processes or require variables available only from complex land surface models (LSMs). The U.S. Climate Prediction Center (CPC) uses the Leaky Bucket (LB) water-balance model to postprocess temperature and precipitation, providing soil moisture (SM) anomalies to assess drought conditions. However, despite its crucial role in the water cycle, snowpack has been neglected by LB and most drought indices. Taking advantage of the high-quality snow water equivalent (SWE) data from The University of Arizona (UA), a single-layer snow scheme, forced by daily temperature and precipitation only, is developed for LB implementation and tested with two independent forcing datasets. Compared against the UA and SNOTEL SWE data over CONUS, LB outperforms a sophisticated LSM (Noah/NLDAS-2), with the median LB versus SNOTEL correlation (RMSE) about 40% (26%) higher (lower) than that from Noah/NLDAS-2, with only slight differences due to different forcing datasets. The changes in the temporal variability of SM due to the snowpack treatment lead to improved temporal and spatial distribution of drought conditions in the LB simulations compared to the reference U.S. Drought Monitor maps, highlighting the importance of snowpack inclusion in drought assessment. The simplicity but reasonable reliability of the LB with snowpack treatment makes it suitable for drought monitoring and forecasting in both snow-covered and snow-free areas, while only requiring precipitation and temperature data (markedly less than other water-balance-based indices). © 2021 American Meteorological SocietyPolicy.Note
6 month embargo; published online: 30 April 2021ISSN
1525-755XVersion
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1175/JHM-D-20-0201.1