Use of continuous intercostal nerve blockade is associated with improved outcomes in patients with multiple rib fractures
Publisher
BMJ Publishing GroupCitation
Uhlich, R., Kerby, J. D., Bosarge, P., & Hu, P. (2021). Use of continuous intercostal nerve blockade is associated with improved outcomes in patients with multiple rib fractures. Trauma Surgery and Acute Care Open, 6(1).Rights
Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Background Rib fractures are common among trauma patients and may result in significant morbidity and mortality. There are numerous treatment options, but ideal management is unclear. Delivery of local anesthetic via an analgesia catheter for continuous intercostal nerve blockade offers an attractive potential option for management of patients with rib fractures. Methods We performed a single-center, retrospective case-control analysis of trauma patients with multiple rib fractures from 2016 to 2018, comparing patients managed with continuous intercostal nerve blockade with standard care. Matching was performed in a 2:1 ratio by Injury Severity Score, age, and gender. Respiratory morbidity potentially secondary to rib fractures, including unplanned intubation, failure of extubation, need for tracheostomy, pneumonia, or mortality, were all identified and included. Potential complications due to catheter insertion were identified to be recorded. The primary outcome of interest was 30-day hospital-free days. Results Nine hundred and thirty-three patients were eligible for analysis, with 48 managed using intercostal blockade compared with 96 matching controls. No complications of intercostal blockade were identified during the study period. Controls demonstrated fewer rib fractures (6.60±4.11 vs. 9.3±3.73, p=0.001) and fewer flail segments (0.8±1.76 vs. 2.0±2.94, p=0.02). Those managed with intercostal blockade demonstrated significantly more 30-day hospital-free days (15.9±6.43 vs. 13.2±9.94, p=0.048), less incidence of pneumonia (4.2% vs. 16.7%, p=0.03), and lower hospital mortality (2.1% vs. 13.5%, p=0.03). When adjusting for number of rib fractures and number of flail segments, use of continuous intercostal nerve blockade was significantly associated with lower hospital mortality (OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.91), pneumonia (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.76), or need for tracheostomy (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.83). Discussion The addition of continuous intercostal nerve blockade may help to improve outcomes in patients with multiple rib fractures compared with standard care alone. Level of evidence Therapeutic/care management; level IV. © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2021.Note
Open access journalISSN
2397-5776Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/tsaco-2020-000600
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC.