JWST noise floor. II. systematic error sources in JWST NIRCam time series
Name:
Schlawin_2021_AJ_161_115.pdf
Size:
6.140Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Schlawin, E.
Leisenring, J.
McElwain, M.W.
Misselt, K.
Don, K.
Greene, T.P.
Beatty, T.
Nikolov, N.
Kelly, D.
Rieke, M.
Affiliation
Steward Observatory, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2021
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
American Astronomical SocietyCitation
Schlawin, E., Leisenring, J., McElwain, M. W., Misselt, K., Don, K., Greene, T. P., ... & Rieke, M. (2021). JWST Noise Floor. II. Systematic Error Sources in JWST NIRCam Time Series. The Astronomical Journal, 161(3), 115.Journal
Astronomical JournalRights
Copyright © 2021 The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) holds great promise for characterizing atmospheres of transiting exoplanets, potentially providing insights into Earth-sized planets within the habitable zones of M-dwarf host stars if photon-limited performance can be achieved. Here, we discuss the systematic error sources that are expected to be present in grism time-series observations with the NIRCam instrument. We find that pointing jitter and highgain antenna moves in addition to the detectors' subpixel crosshatch patterns will produce relatively small variations (less than 6 parts per million, ppm). The time-dependent aperture losses due to thermal instabilities in the optics can also be kept to below 2 ppm. To achieve these low noise values, it is important to employ a sufficiently large (more than 1"1) extraction aperture. Persistence due to charge-trapping will have a minor (less than 3 ppm) effect on the time series 20 minutes into an exposure and is expected to play a much smaller role than it does for the Hubble Space Telescope WFC3 detectors. We expect detector temperature fluctuations to contribute less than 3 ppm. In total, our estimated noise floor from known systematic error sources is only 9 ppm per visit. We urge caution, however, because unknown systematic error sources could be present in flight and will only be measurable on astrophysical sources such as quiescent stars. We find that reciprocity failure may introduce a perennial instrument offset at the 40 ppm level, so corrections may be needed when a multi-instrument multi-observatory spectrum is stitched together over wide wavelength ranges. © 2021 Institute of Physics Publishing. All rights reserved.Note
Immediate accessISSN
0004-6256Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3847/1538-3881/abd8d4