Can deep learning extract useful information about energy dissipation and effective hydraulic conductivity from gridded conductivity fields?
dc.contributor.author | Moghaddam, M.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ferre, P.A.T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ehsani, M.R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Klakovich, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gupta, H.V. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-27T22:33:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-27T22:33:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Moghaddam, M. A., Ferre, P. A. T., Ehsani, M. R., Klakovich, J., & Gupta, H. V. (2021). Can deep learning extract useful information about energy dissipation and effective hydraulic conductivity from gridded conductivity fields? Water (Switzerland), 13(12). | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2073-4441 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/w13121668 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/661057 | |
dc.description.abstract | We confirm that energy dissipation weighting provides the most accurate approach to determining the effective hydraulic conductivity (Keff ) of a binary K grid. A deep learning algorithm (UNET) can infer Keff with extremely high accuracy (R2 > 0.99). The UNET architecture could be trained to infer the energy dissipation weighting pattern from an image of the K distribution, although it was less accurate for cases with highly localized structures that controlled flow. Furthermore, the UNET architecture learned to infer the energy dissipation weighting even if it was not trained directly on this information. However, the weights were represented within the UNET in a way that was not immediately interpretable by a human user. This reiterates the idea that even if ML/DL algorithms are trained to make some hydrologic predictions accurately, they must be designed and trained to provide each user-required output if their results are to be used to improve our understanding of hydrologic systems. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | MDPI AG | |
dc.rights | Copyright © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | Centered kernel alignment | |
dc.subject | Deep learning | |
dc.subject | Effective hydraulic conductivity | |
dc.subject | Energy dissipation | |
dc.subject | Hidden layer representation | |
dc.subject | Hydrogeology | |
dc.subject | Machine learning | |
dc.subject | UNET | |
dc.title | Can deep learning extract useful information about energy dissipation and effective hydraulic conductivity from gridded conductivity fields? | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.type | text | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona | |
dc.identifier.journal | Water (Switzerland) | |
dc.description.note | Open access journal | |
dc.description.collectioninformation | This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu. | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Water (Switzerland) | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-07-27T22:33:04Z |