When and why we disclose distress on SNSs: Perceived affordances, disclosure goals, and anticipated negative evaluations
Name:
Zhao_When_and_why_we_disclose_ ...
Size:
432.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Department of Communication, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2021-12
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier BVCitation
Zhao, P., Lapierre, M. A., Rains, S. A., & Segrin, C. (2021). When and why we disclose distress on SNSs: Perceived affordances, disclosure goals, and anticipated negative evaluations. Computers in Human Behavior, 125.Journal
Computers in Human BehaviorRights
Published by Elsevier Ltd.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Social networking sites (SNSs) offer unprecedented opportunities for broadcasting self-disclosure. However, questions regarding when and why people tend to post distressing information on SNSs have received insufficient scholarly attention. Rooted in the functional approach of self-disclosure, we investigated how perceived SNS affordances (i.e., network accessibility, visibility, and visibility control) are associated with broadcasting distress disclosure tendencies on SNSs via disclosure goals. Working with 398 college students, we found that people disclose distress on SNSs for seeking support and expressing emotions. However, anticipated negative evaluations can lessen the associations between disclosure goals and distress disclosures on SNSs. Furthermore, the results revealed that network accessibility was indirectly associated with distress disclosures on SNSs via support-seeking goals while visibility control was indirectly related to distress disclosures via emotion expression goals. The indirect effects indicate the importance of studying disclosure goals when investigating the associations between affordances and disclosures. Together, this study advances our understanding regarding online distress disclosures by integrating SNS affordances, disclosures goals, and subjective risks.Note
24 month embargo; available online 24 July 2021ISSN
0747-5632Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.chb.2021.106964