Neither acquiescence nor defiance: Tuscan wineries' “flexible reactivity” to the Italian government's quality regulation system
Name:
Revised Manuscript_20210714.pdf
Size:
508.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Eller College of Management, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2021-08-13
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
WileyCitation
Yoo, T., Schilke, O., & Bachmann, R. (2021). Neither acquiescence nor defiance: Tuscan wineries’ “flexible reactivity” to the Italian government’s quality regulation system. British Journal of Sociology.Journal
British Journal of SociologyRights
© 2021 London School of Economics and Political ScienceCollection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
This article introduces the concept of “flexible reactivity” to describe and analyze a form of economic actors' response to multiple judgment devices. Using the example of government regulation in the Tuscan wine industry, we show that wineries can in part comply with the government's quality classifications system while, at the same time, also offering products outside the official classification system. Through this research, we provide novel insights into the role of judgment devices and contribute to a more nuanced understanding of organizational responses to institutional pressures. Extending prior institutional-complexity research, our study illustrates that organizations' reactions to judgment devices are not limited to only the two options of either acquiescence or defiance. The third option—flexibile reactivity—encompasses an explicit combination of acquiescence and defiance at the actor level. Our findings shed new light on how organizations can cope with contradictory external demands such that contrasting logics compete for organizational resources and breed heterogeneous and continuously shifting product offerings. © 2021 London School of Economics and Political ScienceNote
24 month embargo; first published: 13 August 2021ISSN
0007-1315EISSN
1468-4446Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/1468-4446.12883