Rhythm control in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A meta-analysis
Author
Prasitlumkum, N.Chokesuwattanaskul, R.
Cheungpasitporn, W.
Kewcharoen, J.
Thongprayoon, C.
Bathini, T.
Vallabhajosyula, S.
Jongnarangsin, K.
Affiliation
Department of Internal Medicine, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2021
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
MDPICitation
Prasitlumkum, N., Chokesuwattanaskul, R., Cheungpasitporn, W., Kewcharoen, J., Thongprayoon, C., Bathini, T., Vallabhajosyula, S., & Jongnarangsin, K. (2021). Rhythm control in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(18).Journal
Journal of Clinical MedicineRights
Copyright © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Background The presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) dramatically increases higher morbidity and mortality. Recent studies have suggested that early rhythm control may alleviate the burden of poor outcomes. Cur-rently, there remain limited data on whether rhythm or rate control has better efficacy. This study sought to compare both strategies in HFpEF patients with AF. Methods Databases were searched throughout 2020. Studies that reported cardiovascular outcomes amongst HFpEF patients with AF who received either rhythm or rate control were included. Estimates of the effects from the individual studies were extracted and combined using random-effects, a generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. Results Five observational studies were included in the analysis, consisting of 16,953 patients, 13.8% of whom were receiving rhythm control. In comparison with rate control, rhythm control was associated with decreased overall mortality rates (pooled RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75–0.95, with I2 = 0%, p value = 0.009). Conclusions In HFpEF patients with AF, rhythm control was associated with lower mortality, compared to rate control. Further studies are warranted to validate our observation. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.Note
Open access journalISSN
2077-0383Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3390/jcm10184038
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).