Bayesian deep learning for reliable oral cancer image classification
Author
Song, B.Sunny, S.
Li, S.
Gurushanth, K.
Mendonca, P.
Mukhia, N.
Patrick, S.
Gurudath, S.
Raghavan, S.
Tsusennaro, I.
Leivon, S.T.
Kolur, T.
Shetty, V.
Bushan, V.R.
Ramesh, R.
Peterson, T.
Pillai, V.
Wilder-Smith, P.
Sigamani, A.
Suresh, A.
Kuriakose, M.A.
Birur, P.
Liang, R.
Affiliation
Wyant College of Optical Sciences, The University of ArizonaIssue Date
2021
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
The Optical SocietyCitation
Song, B., Sunny, S., Li, S., Gurushanth, K., Mendonca, P., Mukhia, N., Patrick, S., Gurudath, S., Raghavan, S., Tsusennaro, I., Leivon, S. T., Kolur, T., Shetty, V., Bushan, V. R., Ramesh, R., Peterson, T., Pillai, V., Wilder-Smith, P., Sigamani, A., … Liang, R. (2021). Bayesian deep learning for reliable oral cancer image classification. Biomedical Optics Express, 12(10), 6422–6430.Journal
Biomedical Optics ExpressRights
Copyright © 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
In medical imaging, deep learning-based solutions have achieved state-of-the-art performance. However, reliability restricts the integration of deep learning into practical medical workflows since conventional deep learning frameworks cannot quantitatively assess model uncertainty. In this work, we propose to address this shortcoming by utilizing a Bayesian deep network capable of estimating uncertainty to assess oral cancer image classification reliability. We evaluate the model using a large intraoral cheek mucosa image dataset captured using our customized device from high-risk population to show that meaningful uncertainty information can be produced. In addition, our experiments show improved accuracy by uncertainty-informed referral. The accuracy of retained data reaches roughly 90% when referring either 10% of all cases or referring cases whose uncertainty value is greater than 0.3. The performance can be further improved by referring more patients. The experiments show the model is capable of identifying difficult cases needing further inspection. © 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing AgreementNote
Open access journalISSN
2156-7085Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1364/BOE.432365