Aligning green infrastructure to sustainable development: A geographical contribution to an ongoing debate
Name:
GI and Sustainable Development ...
Size:
272.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Author
de Vito, LauraStaddon, Chad
Zuniga‐Teran, Adriana A.
Gerlak, Andrea K.
Schoeman, Yolandi
Hart, Aimee
Booth, Giles
Affiliation
Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of ArizonaSchool of Landscape Architecture and Planning, University of Arizona
School of Geography and Development, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2021-11-29
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
WileyCitation
De Vito, L., Staddon, C., Zuniga-Teran, A. A., Gerlak, A. K., Schoeman, Y., Hart, A., & Booth, G. (2021). Aligning green infrastructure to sustainable development: A geographical contribution to an ongoing debate. Area.Journal
AreaRights
© 2021 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Blue and green infrastructure (BGI) is increasingly viewed as a promising solution to promoting a shift beyond traditionally engineered “grey” approaches towards more socially and environmentally sustainable infrastructure systems. The specific insights of geographical scholarship on how to address issues of processes, scale, and place in BGI design, implementation, and long-term management would help unlock the potential for BGI to be appropriate and inclusive, as well as support environmentally sound solutions. In this paper we unpack issues of processes for inclusive decision-making to design and implement BGI projects that can advance sustainable development. We present an assessment framework and its application to two case studies that highlight the potential for better alignment of BGI projects to the three pillars of sustainable development and that reveal key research challenges that geographical scholarship could address. We believe that co-produced geographical research in this domain is well placed to tackle these research challenges. The information, practices and views in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG).Note
12 month embargo; first published: 27 October 2021ISSN
0004-0894EISSN
1475-4762Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
Lloyd's Register Foundationae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/area.12764