Occupational factors and miscarriages in the US fire service: a cross-sectional analysis of women firefighters
Name:
s12940-021-00800-4.pdf
Size:
1.286Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Jung, A.M.Jahnke, S.A.
Dennis, L.K.
Bell, M.L.
Burgess, J.L.
Jitnarin, N.
Kaipust, C.M.
Farland, L.V.
Affiliation
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of ArizonaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine-Tucson, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2021Keywords
EpidemiologyFirefighters
Miscarriage
Occupational health
Reproductive health
Spontaneous abortion
Women’s health
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
BioMed Central LtdCitation
Jung, A. M., Jahnke, S. A., Dennis, L. K., Bell, M. L., Burgess, J. L., Jitnarin, N., Kaipust, C. M., & Farland, L. V. (2021). Occupational factors and miscarriages in the US fire service: A cross-sectional analysis of women firefighters. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source.Rights
Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Background: Evidence from previous studies suggests that women firefighters have greater risk of some adverse reproductive outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether women firefighters had greater risk of miscarriage compared to non-firefighters and whether there were occupational factors associated with risk of miscarriage among firefighters. Methods: We studied pregnancies in the United States fire service using data from the Health and Wellness of Women Firefighters Study (n = 3181). We compared the prevalence of miscarriage among firefighters to published rates among non-firefighters using age-standardized prevalence ratios. We used generalized estimating equations to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between occupational factors (employment (career/volunteer), wildland firefighter status (wildland or wildland-urban-interface/structural), shift schedule, fire/rescue calls at pregnancy start) and risk of miscarriage, adjusted for age at pregnancy, education, gravidity, BMI, and smoking. We evaluated if associations varied by age at pregnancy or employment. Results: Among 1074 firefighters and 1864 total pregnancies, 404 pregnancies resulted in miscarriages (22%). Among most recent pregnancies, 138 resulted in miscarriage (13%). Compared to a study of US nurses, firefighters had 2.33 times greater age-standardized prevalence of miscarriage (95% CI 1.96–2.75). Overall, we observed that volunteer firefighters had an increased risk of miscarriage which varied by wildland status (interaction p-value< 0.01). Among structural firefighters, volunteer firefighters had 1.42 times the risk of miscarriage (95% CI 1.11–1.80) compared to career firefighters. Among wildland/wildland-urban-interface firefighters, volunteer firefighters had 2.53 times the risk of miscarriage (95% CI 1.35–4.78) compared to career firefighters. Conclusions: Age-standardized miscarriage prevalence among firefighters may be greater than non-firefighters and there may be variation in risk of miscarriage by fire service role. Further research is needed to clarify these associations to inform policy and decision-making. © 2021, The Author(s).Note
Open access journalISSN
1476-069XVersion
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1186/s12940-021-00800-4
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.