Real World Long-term Assessment of The Efficacy of Tocilizumab in Patients with COVID-19: Results From A Large De-identified Multicenter Electronic Health Record Dataset in the United States
Name:
PIIS1201971221007748.pdf
Size:
996.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Nigo, M.Rasmy, L.
May, S.B.
Rao, A.
Karimaghaei, S.
Kannadath, B.S.
De la Hoz, A.
Arias, C.A.
Li, L.
Zhi, D.
Affiliation
College of Medicine, University of Arizona - PhoenixIssue Date
2021
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier B.V.Citation
Nigo, M., Rasmy, L., May, S. B., Rao, A., Karimaghaei, S., Kannadath, B. S., De la Hoz, A., Arias, C. A., Li, L., & Zhi, D. (2021). Real World Long-term Assessment of The Efficacy of Tocilizumab in Patients with COVID-19: Results From A Large De-identified Multicenter Electronic Health Record Dataset in the United States. International Journal of Infectious Diseases.Rights
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Background: Studies have shown conflicting results on the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) for patients with COVID-19, with many confounders of clinical status and limited duration of the observation. Here, we evaluate the real-world long-term efficacy of TCZ in COVID-19 patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 using a large US-based multicenter COVID-19 database (Cerner Real-World Data; updated in September, 2020). The TCZ group was defined as patients who received at least one dose of the drug. Matching weight (MW) and a propensity score weighting method were used to balance confounding factors. Results: A total of 20,399 patients were identified. 1,510 and 18,899 were in the TCZ and control groups, respectively. After MW adjustment, no statistically significant differences in all-cause mortality were found for the TCZ vs. control group (Hazard Ratio [HR]:0.76, p=0.06). Survival curves suggested a better trend in short-term observation, driven from a subgroup of patients requiring oxygen masks, BIPAP or CPAP. Conclusion: We observed a temporal (early) benefit of TCZ, especially in patients on non-invasive high-flow supplemental oxygen. However, the benefit effects faded with longer observation. The long-term benefits and risks of TCZ should be carefully evaluated with follow-up studies. © 2021 The AuthorsNote
Open access journalISSN
1201-9712PubMed ID
34597766Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.067
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).