Evaluating firefly extinction risk: Initial red list assessments for North America
Name:
journal.pone.0259379.pdf
Size:
1.691Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Fallon, C.E.Walker, A.C.
Lewis, S.
Cicero, J.
Faust, L.
Heckscher, C.M.
Pérez-Hernández, C.X.
Pfeiffer, B.
Jepsen, S.
Affiliation
School of Plant Sciences, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2021
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Public Library of ScienceCitation
Fallon, C. E., Walker, A. C., Lewis, S., Cicero, J., Faust, L., Heckscher, C. M., Pérez-Hernández, C. X., Pfeiffer, B., & Jepsen, S. (2021). Evaluating firefly extinction risk: Initial red list assessments for North America. PLoS ONE.Journal
PLoS ONERights
Copyright © 2021 Fallon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Fireflies are a family of charismatic beetles known for their bioluminescent signals. Recent anecdotal reports suggest that firefly populations in North America may be in decline. However, prior to this work, no studies have undertaken a systematic compilation of geographic distribution, habitat specificity, and threats facing North American fireflies. To better understand their extinction risks, we conducted baseline assessments according to the categories and criteria of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List for 132 species from the United States and Canada (approximately 79% of described species in the region). We found at least 18 species (14%) are threatened with extinction (e.g. categorized as Critically Endangered, Endangered, or Vulnerable) due to various pressures, including habitat loss, light pollution, and climate change (sea level rise and drought). In addition, more than half of the species (53%) could not be evaluated against the assessment criteria due to insufficient data, highlighting the need for further study. Future research and conservation efforts should prioritize monitoring and protecting populations of at-risk species, preserving and restoring habitat, gathering data on population trends, and filling critical information gaps for data deficient species suspected to be at risk. © 2021 Fallon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.Note
Open access journalISSN
1932-6203Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1371/journal.pone.0259379
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2021 Fallon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.

