• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Journals and Magazines
    • Society for Range Management Journal Archives
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management / Journal of Range Management
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management, Volume 69 (2016)
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management, Volume 69, Number 5 (September 2016)
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Journals and Magazines
    • Society for Range Management Journal Archives
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management / Journal of Range Management
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management, Volume 69 (2016)
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management, Volume 69, Number 5 (September 2016)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Does supplemental feeding of white-tailed deer alter response of palatable shrubs to browsing?

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Does-Supplemental-Feeding-of-W ...
    Size:
    1.214Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Gann, W.J.
    Fulbright, T.E.
    Grahmann, E.D.
    Hewitt, D.G.
    Deyoung, C.A.
    Wester, D.B.
    Korzekwa, B.A.
    Echols, K.N.
    Draeger, D.A.
    Issue Date
    2016
    Keywords
    Celtis ehrenbergiana
    deer density
    deer effects on vegetation
    Eysenhardtia texana
    Odocoileus virginianus
    spiny hackberry
    supplemental feed
    Texas kidneywood
    white-tailed deer
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Gann, W. J., Fulbright, T. E., Grahmann, E. D., Hewitt, D. G., Deyoung, C. A., Wester, D. B., Korzekwa, B. A., Echols, K. N., & Draeger, D. A. (2016). Does supplemental feeding of white-tailed deer alter response of palatable shrubs to browsing? Rangeland Ecology & Management, 69(5), 399–407.
    Publisher
    Society for Range Management
    Journal
    Rangeland Ecology & Management
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10150/662761
    DOI
    10.1016/j.rama.2016.06.002
    Additional Links
    https://rangelands.org/
    Abstract
    The impact on palatable shrubs when herbivores have access to high-quality food is unclear. We determined if providing high-quality food and increasing white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) density reduced growth and altered nutritional quality of two palatable shrub species. We maintained target densities of 13, 31, or 50 deer km-2 in six 81-ha-1 enclosures on each of two ranches. We provided nutritious, dry feed ad libitum in one of each pair of enclosures with similar densities on each ranch. We measured height and width of Texas kidneywood (Eysenhardtia texana Scheele) and spiny hackberry (Celtis ehrenbergiana [Klotzsch] Liebm), measured hackberry thorns, and estimated crude protein. Plants were protected from browsing with wire exclosures in 2005; a similar-sized unprotected plant was paired with each protected plant. We estimated density of shrub species using twenty 3 × 50mbelt transects/enclosure June 2005, 2007-2012. Growth of protected and unprotected kidneywood was similar (P ≥ 0.88) at 13 deer km-2, but growth was reduced (P ≤ 0.05) by higher deer densities. Protection from browsing and increasing deer density did not influence (P ≥ 0.25) size of spiny hackberry. Browsed kidneywood plants had a 34% lower crude protein (P ≤ 0.01) compared with protected plants when deer did not have access to feed. Spiny hackberry protein was greater (P ≤ 0.05) in unprotected plants compared with protected plants at 50 deer km-2. Response of Texas kidneywood density at > 1.5-mtall to deer density depended on year (P=0.04), with no effect of deer density (P ≥ 0.10) on spiny hackberry density. Density of both shrubs was similar (P > 0.14) with and without supplement. Access to feed does not alter effects of browsing on these sympatric shrubs; however, responses to increasing herbivore density contrast. Texas kidneywood is less tolerant of herbivory than spiny hackberry. © 2016 The Society for Range Management. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Type
    Article
    text
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    1550-7424
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.rama.2016.06.002
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Rangeland Ecology & Management, Volume 69, Number 5 (September 2016)

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.