Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTaylor, K.L.
dc.contributor.authorBeck, J.L.
dc.contributor.authorHuzurbazar, S.V.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-07T19:54:52Z
dc.date.available2022-01-07T19:54:52Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationTaylor, K. L., Beck, J. L., & Huzurbazar, S. V. (2016). Factors Influencing Winter Mortality Risk for Pronghorn Exposed to Wind Energy Development. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 69(2), 108–116.
dc.identifier.issn1550-7424
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rama.2015.12.003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/662795
dc.description.abstractEvaluating the influence of energy development on pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) winter mortality risk is particularly critical given that northern populations already experience decreased survival due to harsh environmental conditions and increased energetic demands during this season. The purpose of our study was to evaluate pronghorn mortality risk over 3 winters (2010, 2010-2011, 2011-2012) on a landscape developed in 2010 for wind energy production (Dunlap Ranch) in south-central Wyoming, United States. We obtained locational data and survival status of 47 adult female pronghorn captured and equipped with Global Positioning System (GPS) transmitters. Overall, 17 pronghorn died during winter seasons, with 76.4% (13) of deaths occurring during the winter with highest snow accumulation (2010-2011). Survival (Š) was lowest in winter 2010-2011 (Š = 0.53, 90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.70) and highest in winters 2010 (Š = 0.97, 90% CI: 0.92-1.00) and 2011-2012 (Š = 0.91, 90% CI: 0.82-1.00). We modeled mortality risk for pronghorn using Cox's proportional hazards model inclusive of time-dependent and time-independent covariates within anthropogenic, environmental, and wind energy variable classes. Across winters, pronghorn winter mortality risk decreased by 20% with every 1.0-km increase in average distance from major roads (hazard ratio = 0.80, 90% CI: 0.66-0.98), decreased by 4.0% with every 1% increase in average time spent in sagebrush (Artemisia spp. L; hazard ratio = 0.96, 90% CI: 0.95-0.98), and decreased by 92% with every 1 unit (VRM × 1000) increase in terrain ruggedness (hazard ratio = 0.08,90% CI: 0.01-0.68). Pronghorn winter survival was not influenced by exposure to wind energy infrastructure; however, pronghorn survival may be impacted by larger-scale wind energy developments than those examined in our study. We recommend wildlife managers focus on conserving sagebrush stands in designated pronghorn winter range. © 2016 The Society for Range Management. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectAntilocapra americana
dc.subjectCox's proportional hazards regression
dc.subjectmortality risk
dc.subjectpronghorn survival
dc.subjectwind energy
dc.subjectwinter range
dc.titleFactors Influencing Winter Mortality Risk for Pronghorn Exposed to Wind Energy Development
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.source.journaltitleRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.source.volume69
dc.source.issue2
dc.source.beginpage108
dc.source.endpage116
refterms.dateFOA2022-01-07T19:54:52Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Factors-Influencing-Winter-Mor ...
Size:
400.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record