Responding to Ecosystem Transformation: Resist, Accept, or Direct?
Author
Thompson, Laura M.Lynch, Abigail J.
Beever, Erik A.
Engman, Augustin C.
Falke, Jeffrey A.
Jackson, Stephen T.
Krabbenhoft, Trevor J.
Lawrence, David J.
Limpinsel, Douglas
Magill, Robert T.
Melvin, Tracy A.
Morton, John M.
Newman, Robert A.
Peterson, Jay O.
Porath, Mark T.
Rahel, Frank J.
Sethi, Suresh A.
Wilkening, Jennifer L.
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept GeosciUniv Arizona, Sch Nat Resources & Environm
Issue Date
2020-09-15
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
WileyCitation
Thompson, L. M., Lynch, A. J., Beever, E. A., Engman, A. C., Falke, J. A., Jackson, S. T., ... & Wilkening, J. L. (2021). Responding to ecosystem transformation: resist, accept, or direct?. Fisheries, 46(1), 8-21.Journal
FisheriesRights
© 2020 American Fisheries Society. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Ecosystem transformation can be defined as the emergence of a self-organizing, self-sustaining, ecological or social-ecological system that deviates from prior ecosystem structure and function. These transformations are occurring across the globe; consequently, a static view of ecosystem processes is likely no longer sufficient for managing fish, wildlife, and other species. We present a framework that encompasses three strategies for fish and wildlife managers dealing with ecosystems vulnerable to transformation. Specifically, managers can resist change and strive to maintain existing ecosystem composition, structure, and function; accept transformation when it is not feasible to resist change or when changes are deemed socially acceptable; or direct change to a future ecosystem configuration that would yield desirable outcomes. Choice of a particular option likely hinges on anticipating future change, while also acknowledging that temporal and spatial scales, recent history and current state of the system, and magnitude of change can factor into the decision. This suite of management strategies can be implemented using a structured approach of learning and adapting as ecosystems change.Note
Public domain articleISSN
0363-2415EISSN
1548-8446Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/fsh.10506
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2020 American Fisheries Society. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.