Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorO'neill, M.M.F.
dc.contributor.authorTijerina, D.T.
dc.contributor.authorCondon, L.E.
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell, R.M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-25T00:15:54Z
dc.date.available2022-01-25T00:15:54Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationO’neill, M. M. F., Tijerina, D. T., Condon, L. E., & Maxwell, R. M. (2021). Assessment of the ParFlow-CLM CONUS 1.0 integrated hydrologic model: Evaluation of hyper-resolution water balance components across the contiguous United States. Geoscientific Model Development.
dc.identifier.issn1991-959X
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/gmd-14-7223-2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/662983
dc.description.abstractRecent advancements in computational efficiency and Earth system modeling have awarded hydrologists with increasingly high-resolution models of terrestrial hydrology, which are paramount to understanding and predicting complex fluxes of moisture and energy. Continental-scale hydrologic simulations are, in particular, of interest to the hydrologic community for numerous societal, scientific, and operational benefits. The coupled hydrology-land surface model ParFlow-CLM configured over the continental United States (PFCONUS) has been employed in previous literature to study scale-dependent connections between water table depth, topography, recharge, and evapotranspiration, as well as to explore impacts of anthropogenic aquifer depletion to the water and energy balance. These studies have allowed for an unprecedented process-based understanding of the continental water cycle at high resolution. Here, we provide the most comprehensive evaluation of PFCONUS version 1.0 (PFCONUSv1) performance to date by comparing numerous modeled water balance components with thousands of in situ observations and several remote sensing products and using a range of statistical performance metrics for evaluation. PFCONUSv1 comparisons with these datasets are a promising indicator of model fidelity and ability to reproduce the continental-scale water balance at high resolution. Areas for improvement are identified, such as a positive streamflow bias at gauges in the eastern Great Plains, a shallow water table bias over many areas of the model domain, and low bias in seasonal total water storage amplitude, especially for the Ohio, Missouri, and Arkansas River basins. We discuss several potential sources for model bias and suggest that minimizing error in topographic processing and meteorological forcing would considerably improve model performance. Results here provide a benchmark and guidance for further PFCONUS model development, and they highlight the importance of concurrently evaluating all hydrologic components and fluxes to provide a multivariate, holistic validation of the complete modeled water balance. © 2021 Mary M. F. O'Neill et al.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCopernicus GmbH
dc.rightsCopyright © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleAssessment of the ParFlow-CLM CONUS 1.0 integrated hydrologic model: evaluation of hyper-resolution water balance components across the contiguous United States
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalGeoscientific Model Development
dc.description.noteOpen access journal
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.source.journaltitleGeoscientific Model Development
refterms.dateFOA2022-01-25T00:15:54Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
gmd-14-7223-2021.pdf
Size:
28.71Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.