Name:
Matsuyama_2021_Planet._Sci._J. ...
Size:
4.786Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2021
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Web Portal IOPCitation
Matsuyama, I., Trinh, A., & Keane, J. T. (2021). The lunar fossil figure in a cassini state. Planetary Science Journal.Journal
Planetary Science JournalRights
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The present ellipsoidal figure of the Moon requires a deformation that is significantly larger than the hydrostatic deformation in response to the present rotational and tidal potentials. This has long been explained as due to a fossil rotational and tidal deformation from a time when the Moon was closer to Earth. Previous studies constraining the orbital parameters at the time the fossil deformation was established find that high orbit eccentricities (e ≳ 0.2) are required at this ancient time, which is difficult to reconcile with the freezing of a fossil figure owing to the expected large tidal heating. We extend previous fossil deformation studies in several ways. First, we consider the effect of removing South Pole−Aitken (SPA) contributions from the present observed deformation using a nonaxially symmetric SPA model. Second, we use the assumption of an equilibrium Cassini state as an additional constraint, which allows us to consider the fossil deformation due to nonzero obliquity self-consistently. A fossil deformation established during Cassini state 1, 2, or 4 is consistent with the SPA-corrected present deformation. However, a fossil deformation established during Cassini state 2 or 4 requires large obliquity and orbit eccentricity (ò ∼ 68° and e ∼ 0.65), which are difficult to reconcile with the corresponding strong tidal heating. The most likely explanation is a fossil deformation established during Cassini state 1, with a small obliquity (ò ∼ −0.2°) and an orbit eccentricity range that includes zero eccentricity (0 ≼ e ≲ 0.3). © 2021. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.Note
Open access journalISSN
2632-3338Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3847/PSJ/ac32d9
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.

